Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:25:33.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Summa ad iniungendam penitentiam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2016

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Institute of Research and Study in Medieval Canon Law Bulletin For 1963
Copyright
Copyright © Fordham University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The composite nature of D. 83 c. 3 is known. The first sentence appears, ascribed to ‘Innocentius’ (as in Grat. and Barb. c. 1), in Alger of Liège, De misericordia et iustitia 2.5 (PL 180.899); the second is quoted again by Gratian in C. 2 q. 7 c. 55, from Ps.-Eleutherius JK † 68 c. 6 (Hinschius p. 127), and in D. 86 c. 3 from John VIII JE 3011 c. 5 (ed. Caspar, E., MGH Epp. 7. 306); its ultimate source is Felix III JK 592 c. 8 (ed. Thiel p. 237).Google Scholar

2 Un manuscrit intéressant du “Compendium” de Werner von Schussenried,’ Traditio 18 (1962) 472–82; also published in Czech, in Studie o rukopisech (Études codicologiques publiées par la Commission scientifique pour l’étude des manuscrits de l'Académie Tchécoslovaque des Sciences) 1962 pp. 133–53.Google Scholar

3 Lacombe, G., La vie et les œuvres de Prévostin (Bibliothèque thomiste 11; Le Saulchoir 1927) 6770.Google Scholar

4 Art. ‘Prévostin,’ DThC 13 (1936) 165. Google Scholar

5 L. Hödl, Die Geschichte der scholastischen Literatur und der Theologie der Schlüsselgewalt I (Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters 38.4; Münster 1960) 276–80, 286–9 (with texts). Google Scholar

6 Michaud, P.-Quantin, Sommes de casuistique et manuels de confession au moyen âge The special abbreviation Bartolo indicates the two volumes, Bartolo da Sassoferrato: Studi e documenti per il VI centenario, published by the University of Perugia (Milan 1962), liii, 474 and 786 pp. Also, BIHR = Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research; DA = Deutsches Archiv für die Erforschung des Mittelalters. S. K. Acta Innocentii pp. IV: see Haluščynski. A. Adversi, ‘Gli incunabili italiani del “Decretum Gratiani”,’ Il Diritto ecclesiastico 73 (1962: fasc. 3–4, supplem.) 308–74. Resumes an earlier study from L'Archiginnasio 1959 (not seen) on incunabula printed and/or preserved in Italy; supplements in many details the descriptions by Will, E. (SG 6 [1959]; cf. Bulletin for 1960, Trad. 16.570), see esp. Nos. 1, 4, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 29, 34, 46. —, ‘Gli scritti canonistici di Lodovico Bolognini, giureconsulto bolognese del secolo XV (Note bibliografiche),’ SG 8 (1962) 611–35. G. Anderson, C., ‘Medieval Medicine for Sin,’ Journal of Religion and Health 2 (1963) 156–65. Discusses from a specific point of view some passages from various penitentials (no footnotes). C. Andresen, ‘Geschichte der abendländischen Konzile des Mittelalters,’ Die ökumenischen Konzile der Christenheit ed. Margull, H. J. (Stuttgart 1961) 75–200. (XII-XVI siècles) (Analecta mediaevalia Namurcensia 13; Louvain-Lille-Montréal 1962) 20; Boháček, ‘Summa Richardi …’ (see n. 8 infra) 176.Google Scholar

7 Gründel, J., Die Lehre von den Umständen der menschlichen Handlung im Mittelalter (Beiträge zur Gesch. etc. 39.5; Münster 1963) 396–405 (text, 397–401).Google Scholar

8 Studie o rukopisech 1963, pp. 175–84.Google Scholar

9 Lacombe, , La vie … 69; Hödl, op. cit. 277 (for V); Boháček, ‘Summa Richardi …’ 184 n. 9 (for K).Google Scholar

10 Loc. cit. Since Hödl's book was not accessible to Professor Boháček, he still follows Lacombe's erroneous identification with an earlier Peter of Capua, who became cardinal in 1193, and places the work of Richardus before that date. On the theologian Peter of Capua (cardinal in 1219) cf. Landgraf, A., Einführung in die Geschichte der theologischen Literatur der Frühscholastik (Regensburg 1948) 109.Google Scholar