Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:06:28.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subcultural Delusions and Hallucinations Comments on the Present State Examination in a Multi-Cultural Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

L. Swartz ,
O. Ben-Arie  and
A. F. Teggin
L. Swartz
Affiliation:
MRC Clinical Psychiatry Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cape Town, Groote Schuur Hospital, OBSERVATORY 7925, Rebublic of South Africa
O. Ben-Arie*
Affiliation:
MRC Clinical Psychiatry Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cape Town, Groote Schuur Hospital, OBSERVATORY 7925, Rebublic of South Africa
A. F. Teggin
Affiliation:
MRC Clinical Psychiatry Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cape Town, Groote Schuur Hospital, OBSERVATORY 7925, Rebublic of South Africa
*
∗Correspondence
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The challenges presented by the Present State Examination (PSE) in a multi-cultural context are explored. The general approach to the use of this instrument, difficulties with rating items relevant to cultural or subcultural conditions, and particularly the assessment of psychosis are considered, as well as the possibility of additions to and modifications of the PSE-CATEGO system. Though disagreement exists as to whether the research model which the PSE represents is adequate to deal exhaustively with cultural factors, the instrument is useful in cross-cultural research and also in stimulating debate and crystallising issues.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 146 , Issue 4 , April 1985 , pp. 391 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ebigbo, P. D. (1982) Development of a culture specific (Nigeria) screening scale of somatic complaints indicating psychiatric disturbance. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 6, 29–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillis, L. S., Elk, R., Ben-arie, O. & Teggin, A. (1982) The Present State Examination: experiences with Xhosa-speaking psychiatric patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 143–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleinman, A. M. (1977) Depression, somatization and the “new cross-cultural psychiatry”. Social Science and Medicine, 11, 3–10.Google Scholar
Leff, J. (1981) Psychiatry around the Globe: A Transcultural View. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Okasha, A. & Ashour, A. (1981) Psycho-demographic study of anxiety in Egypt: the PSE in its Arabic version. British Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 70–73.Google Scholar
Orley, J. & Wing, J. K. (1979) Psychiatric disorders in two African villages. Archives of General Psychiatry, 36, 513–520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prince, R. (1983) Review of Psychiatry around the Globe by Julian Leff. Transcultural Psychiatric Research Review, 20, 114–118.Google Scholar
Sturt, E. (1981) Hierarchical patterns in the distribution of psychiatric symptoms. Psychological Medicine, 11, 783–794.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K., Cooper, J. E. & Sartorius, N. (1974) The Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K. & Sturt, E. (1978) The PSE-ID-CATEGO System: Supplementary Manual. Institute of Psychiatry: Mimeo.Google Scholar
World Health Organisation (1973) The International Pilot Study of Schizophrenia. Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.