Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T03:08:42.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

[No-Title]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Eliot Slater
Eliot Slater*
Affiliation:
R.M.P.A., Chandos House, 2 Queen Anne Street, London, W.1
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 114 , Issue 516 , November 1968 , pp. 1479 - 1480
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1968 

References

1. Hall, Trevor H. (1964). “Reply to Dr. Ian Stevenson's review of The Spiritualists.” J. Amer. Soc. psychical. Res., 58, 57–65.Google Scholar
2. Stevenson, Ian (1964). “Rejoinder to Mr. Trevor Hall's reply.” Ibid., 58, 128–133.Google Scholar
3. Hall, Trevor H. (1964). The Strange Case of Edmund Gurney. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
4. Hall, Trevor H. (1968). “Some comments on Mr. Fraser Nicol's review.” Int. J. Parapsych., 10, 149–164.Google Scholar
5. Dingwall, Eric J. (1966). The Critics' Dilemma. Crowhurst, Sussex: Dingwall.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.