Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T17:47:13.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparing the quality of data from several clinical trials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Peter Tyrer  and
Jonathan Tyrer
Peter Tyrer
Affiliation:
St Charles Hospital, London W10 6DZ
Jonathan Tyrer
Affiliation:
Department of Probability and Statistics, University of Sheffield
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Columns
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 160 , Issue 1 , January 1992 , pp. 126
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

References

Chalmers, T. C., Smith, H. Jr., Blackburn, B., et al (1981) A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Controlled Clinical Trials, 2, 31–49.Google Scholar
Johnson, T. (1989) Methodology of clinical trials in psychiatry. In Research Methods in Psychiatry: a Beginner's Guide (eds Freeman, C. & Tyrer, P.), pp. 12–45. London: Gaskell.Google Scholar
Pocock, S. J. (1983) Clinical Trials: a Practical Approach. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.