Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:44:32.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Analysis of Out-patient Services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

D. A. W. Johnson*
Affiliation:
University Hospital of South Manchester, West Didsbury, Manchester, M20 8LR; Crumpsall Hospital, Manchester, 8

Extract

The psychiatric out-patient department fulfils a comprehensive role in the diagnosis and treatment of a wide range of psychiatric disorders; it is no longer an annexe of the mental hospital principally concerned with providing follow-up and support for discharged patients. But despite the enormous growth of out-patient facilities and treatments, there have been few studies analysing the out-patient services. The Bethlem Royal and Maudsley Hospitals present detailed accounts of their out-patients, but although they serve a defined area their special functions possibly make their clientele unrepresentative. Diagnoses of out-patients in Buckinghamshire were analysed by Kessel and Shepherd (1962), but this survey gives no information about the treatment or disposal of patients. Innes and Sharp (1962) presented detailed statistics for combined inpatient and out-patients in the North East of Scotland, but did not separate the two classes of patients. The most comprehensive information concerning patients attending a hospital psychiatric out-patient department—their diagnosis, treatment and disposal—comes from Kessel and Hassall (1965 and 1971) in their evaluation of the functioning of the new Plymouth Nuffield Clinic, and from Kaeser and Cooper (1971) who investigated a group of general practitioner referrals to the Maudsley Hospital to assess the satisfaction gained by the patients and family doctors from such consultations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1973 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eastwood, M. R., Mirdham, R. H. S., and Tennent, T. G. (1970). ‘The physical status of psychiatric emergencies.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 116, 545.Google Scholar
Glossary of Mental Disorders (1965). London: H.M. Stationery Office Google Scholar
Hopkins, P. (1956). ‘Referrals in general practice.’ Brit. med. J., ii, 873.Google Scholar
Hopkins, P. and Cooper, B. (1969). ‘Psychiatric referral from a general practice’, Brit. J. Psychiat., 115, 1163–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Innes, G., and Sharp, G. A. (1962). ‘A study of psychiatric patients in North-East Scotland.’ J. ment. Sci., 108, 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. A. W. (1968). ‘Evaluation of routine physical examination in psychiatric patients.’ Practitioner, 200, 686.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. A. W. (1969). ‘Physical illness in psychiatric patients.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 115, 122.Google Scholar
Kaeser, A. C., and Cooper, B. (1971). ‘The psychiatric patient, the general practitioner and the out-patient clinic: an operational study and a review.’ Psychological Medicine, 1, 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessel, W. I. N. (1963). ‘Who ought to see a psychiatrist?Lancet, 1092–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessel, W. I. N., and Shepherd, M. (1962). ‘Neurosis in hospital and general practice.’ J. ment. Science, 108, 159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessel, W. I. N., and Hassall, C. (1965). ‘Psychiatric out-patients in Plymouth—an area service analysed.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 111, 10.Google Scholar
Kessel, W. I. N., and Hassall, C. (1971). ‘Evaluation of the functioning of the Plymouth Nuffield Clinic.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 118, 305.Google Scholar
Leigh, D. (1955). ‘An analysis of one thousand domiciliary consultations.’ Lancet, ii, 1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, M. E. S. (1949). ‘Incidence of physical disorders among psychiatric in-patients.’ Brit. med. J., ii, 468.Google Scholar
Wynne-Davies, D. (1965). ‘Physical illness in psychiatric out-patients’. Brit. J. Psychiat., 111, 27.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.