Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T15:39:11.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The COSTAR Programme. 1: Improving Social Networks of the Long-Term Mentally Ill

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Graham Thornicroft  and
William R. Breakey
Graham Thornicroft*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF and Maudsley Hospital
William R. Breakey
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
*
∗Correspondence
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study examined the socio-demographic, clinical, cognitive, social behaviour and social network characteristics of the 97 patients in contact with the COSTAR programme – a mobile treatment and case management service for the long-term mentally ill in inner-city Baltimore. Compared with shorter-contact patients, those in contact for more than one year showed no change in symptoms, or in cognitive or global function. They did manifest improved social function, especially for slowness, personal hygiene and posturing. The long-contact group showed improvements in the quality and quantity of their social networks. Our results suggest that a home-based treatment system can help patients to reverse a vicious cycle of social isolation and to establish supportive social contacts.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 159 , Issue 2 , August 1991 , pp. 245 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1967) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edn revised) (DSM–III–R). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Avison, W. & Speechley, K. (1987) The discharged psychiatric patients: a review of social, social-psychological, and psychiatric correlates of outcome. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 10–18.Google ScholarPubMed
Braun, P., Kochansky, G., Shapiro, R., et al (1981) Overview: deinstitutionalisation of psychiatric patients, a critical review of outcome studies. American Journal of Psychiatry, 138, 736–749.Google Scholar
Breakey, W. (1989) Integrating training and research with clinical services in a community setting. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 40, 1175–1179.Google Scholar
Brugha, T., Sturt, E., MacCarthy, B., et al (1987) The Interview Measure of Social Relationships. Social Psychiatry, 22, 123–128.Google Scholar
Endicott, L., Spitzer, R., Fleiss, J., et al (1976) The global assessment scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 766–771.Google Scholar
Folstein, M., Folstein, S. & McHuoh, P. (1975) Mini Mental State, a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.Google Scholar
Goering, P., Wasylenki, D., Farkas, M., et al (1988) What difference does case management make? Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 39, 272–276.Google Scholar
Harris, M., & Bergman, H. (1988) Misconceptions about use of case management services by the chronic mentally ill. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 39, 1276–1280.Google Scholar
Henderson, S., Duncan-Jones, P., McAuley, H., et al (1978) The patient's primary group. British Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 74–86.Google Scholar
Intagliata, J. (1982) Improving the quality of care for the chronic mentally disabled: the role of case management. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 8, 655–674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overall, J. & Gorham, D. (1962) Brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychological Reports, 10, 799–812.Google Scholar
Stein, L. & Test, M. (1980) Alternative to mental hospital treatment. I Conceptual model, treatment program and clinical evaluation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 392–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
TAPS (1989) Fourth Annual Report of the Team for the Assessment of Psychiatric Services. London: North East Thames Regional Health Authority.Google Scholar
Thornicroft, G. & Bebbington, P. (1989) Deinstitutionalisation – from hospital closure to service development: a review of the literature. British Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 789–753.Google Scholar
Wykes, T. & Sturt, E. (1986) The measurement of social behaviour in psychiatric patients: an assessment of the reliability and validity of the SBS schedule. British Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.