Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T06:36:31.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What the galaxies of the Local Group tell us about massive star evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

Philip Massey
Philip Massey*
Affiliation:
National Optical Astronomy Observatories, P.O. Box 26732, Tucson, AZ 85726-6732, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We consider what we've learned about massive star evolution from observations of the resolved stellar content of Local Group galaxies. Studies of mixed-age (galaxy-wide) and coeval (single associations) populations reveal much about massive star evolution, and how it is controlled by metallicity, demonstrating the ‘Conti scenario’ in action! The number of WC stars to WN stars increases with increasing metallicity, as expected: in regions of higher metallicity stars of somewhat lower luminosity can evolve all the way to the WC stage. The exception is the starburst galaxy IC 10, for which I speculate that the IMF may be weighted towards high mass stars. The highest luminosity red supergiants are lacking in galaxies of higher metallicity, suggesting that the stars that would have become these RSGs are spending more of their time as WRs. The presence of luminous RSGs is highly correlated with the presence of WC and WN stars in OB associations, suggesting that many massive stars evolve through both a RSG and WR stage. The relative number of RSGs and WRs does decrease strongly with increasing metallicity, again consistent with higher metallicity systems leading to increased time in the WR phase. The various WC subclasses appear to be the result of the influence of metallicity on stellar wind structure in these stars, and are not due to to differences in mass or luminosity. Data on the field population in the Magellanic Clouds suggest that stars more massive than 30 become WRs in the LMC, while the limit may be more like 50 in the SMC, again as expected. Studies of the turn-off masses in clusters and associations in the MCs and Milky Way are nearing completion, while investigations in the more distant galaxies of the Local Group are just getting underway. For the LMC we find the following: WNE stars come from a large mass range of progenitor (30–100 ), and have very large (negative) bolometric corrections (−6 to −8 mag). The Ofpe/WN9 stars seem to come from lower mass progenitor (20–30 ), and have more modest BCs (−1 to −3 mag). WC stars come from stars with masses > 60–70 , and have BCs of −3 to −4 mag. Both ‘B2I+WN3’ systems and LBV stars like S Doradus are found only in clusters containing very high turn off masses (>70–90 ).

Type
Part 4. Wolf-Rayet stars and other hot massive stars in the Galactic Center and in Local Group giant H II regions (individual stars)
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 193: Wolf-Rayet Phenomena in Massive Stars and Starburst Galaxies , 1999 , pp. 429 - 440
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 1999 

References

Armandroff, T.E., Massey, P. 1985, ApJ 291, 685 Google Scholar
Armandroff, T. E., Massey, P. 1991, AJ 102, 927 Google Scholar
Conti, P.S. 1976, Mem. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liège, 6e Ser. 9, 193 Google Scholar
Conti, P.S. 1982, in: de Loore, C.W.H. & Willis, A.J. (eds.), Wolf-Rayet Stars: Observations, Physics, Evolution, Proc. IAU Symp. No. 99 (Dordrecht: Kluwer), p. 3 Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, L.A., Massey, P., Strom, S.E., Merrill, K.M. 1993, AJ 106, 1906 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, R.M., Nichols, M., Massey, P. 1985, AJ 90, 101 Google Scholar
Lundstrom, I., Stenholm, B. 1984, A&AS 58, 163 Google Scholar
Maeder, A., Conti, P.S. 1994, ARAA 32, 227 Google Scholar
Maeder, A., Lequeux, J., Azzopardi, M. 1980, A&A 90, L17 Google Scholar
Massey, P. 1998a, in: Aparicio, A., Herrero, A., Sanchez, F. (eds.) Stellar Astrophysics for the Local Group (Cambridge: CUP), p. 95 Google Scholar
Massey, P. 1998b, ApJ 501, 153 Google Scholar
Massey, P. 1998c, in: Gilmore, G. & Howell, D. (eds.) The Stellar Initial Mass Function, Proc. 38th Herstmonceux Conf., ASP-CS 142, 17 Google Scholar
Massey, P., Armandroff, T.E. 1995, AJ 109, 2470 Google Scholar
Massey, P., Armandroff, T.E., Conti, P.S. 1986, AJ 92, 1303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, P., Armandroff, T.E., Conti, P.S. 1992, AJ 103, 1159 Google Scholar
Massey, P., Bianchi, L., Hutchings, J.B., Stecher, T.P. 1996, ApJ 469, 629 Google Scholar
Massey, P., Johnson, J. 1993, AJ 105, 980 Google Scholar
Massey, P., Johnson, O. 1998, ApJ 505, 793 Google Scholar
Massey, P., Johnson, K.E., DeGioia-Eastwood, K. 1995a, ApJ 454, 151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, P., Lang, C.C., DeGioia-Eastwood, K., Garmany, CD. 1995b, ApJ 438, 188 Google Scholar
Schild, H., Maeder, A. 1984, A&A 136, 237 Google Scholar
Schild, H., Smith, L.J., Willis, A.J. 1990, A&A 237, 169 Google Scholar
Shara, M.M., Smith, L.F., Potter, M., Moffat, A.F.J. 1991, AJ 102, 716 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L.F. 1968, MNRAS 141, 317 Google Scholar
Smith, L.F., Maeder, A. 1991, A&A 241, 77 Google Scholar
Smith, L.F., Meynet, G., Mermilliod, J.-C. 1994, A&A 287, 835 Google Scholar
St-Louis, N., Moffat, A.F.J., Turbide, L., Bertrand, J.-F. 1998, in: Howarth, I.D. (ed.), Boulder-Munich II: Properties of Hot, Luminous Stars, ASP-CS 131, 326 Google Scholar
Vreux, J.-M., Detal, A., Fraipont-Caro, D., Gosset, E., Rauw, G., (eds.), Wolf-Rayet Stars in the Framework of Stellar Evolution, Proc. 33 rd Liège Int. Astroph. Coll. (Liège: Univ. of Liège)Google Scholar