Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:00:22.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theory, observation and experiment: stellar hydrodynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

David Arnett*
Affiliation:
Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Computer technology now allows two dimensional (2D) simulations, with complex microphysics, of stellar hydrodynamics and evolutionary sequences, and holds the promise for 3D. Careful validation of astrophysical methods, by laboratory experiment, by critical comparison of numerical and analytical methods, and by observation are necessary for the development of simulation methods with reliable predictive capability. Recent and surprising results from isotopic patterns in pre-solar grains, 2D hydrodynamic simulations of stellar evolution, and laser tests and computer simulations of Richtmeyer-Meshkov and Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities will be discussed, and related to stellar evolution and supernovae.

Type
Evolved Stars
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1997 

References

Amari, S., Hoppe, P., Zinner, E., Lewis, R. S. Astrophys. J. 394, L43, 1992.Google Scholar
Arnett, D., Supernovae and Nucleosynthesis , Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Bazan, G. & Arnett, D., Astrophys. J. , 1997, in press.Google Scholar
Clayton, D. D., Arnett, D., Kane, J., & Meyer, B. S., 1997, Astrophys. J. Letters , in press.Google Scholar
Hoppe, P., Strebel, R., Eberhardt, P., et al., Science 272, 1314, 1996.Google Scholar
Kane, J., Arnett, D., Remington, B., et al., 1997, Astrophys. J. Letters , in press.Google Scholar
Landau, L. D., & Lifshitz, E. M., Fluid Mechanics , Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1959, ch. VI.Google Scholar
Remington, B. A., Weber, S. V., Marinak, M. M., et al., Phys. Plasmas 2, 241, 1995.Google Scholar