Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T01:56:42.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiation Transfer and Photochemical Effects in Inhomogeneous Dense Clouds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2017

S. Aiello ,
C. Cecchi Pestellini  and
S. Tiné
S. Aiello
Affiliation:
Dip. di Astronomia e Scienza dello Spazio, Università di Firenze, Italy
C. Cecchi Pestellini
Affiliation:
Dip. di Astronomia e Scienza dello Spazio, Università di Firenze, Italy Harvard-Smithsonian Institute of Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
S. Tiné
Affiliation:
Dip. di Astronomia e Scienza dello Spazio, Università di Firenze, Italy

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

UV radiation leads to photodissociation and photoionization of molecular species in diffuse clouds and in the extended envelopes of dark regions. In the inner part of heavily-obscured objects, the residual external field may be negligible; alternative mechanisms, such as cosmic-ray-induced H2 emission, appear to be efficient in photodestruction processes. We evaluate the relative importance of these radiation sources, and give some estimates of their effects on the mean lifetime of interstellar molecules, taking into account the cloud structure that significantly affects the penetration depth of UV radiation.

Type
Quiescent Clouds and Regions of Star Formation
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 150: Astrochemistry of Cosmic Phenomena , 1992 , pp. 231 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1992 

References

REFERENCES

Aiello, S., Rosolia, A., Barsella, B., Ferrini, F. and Iorio, D., 1984, Nuovo Cimento, 7, 840.Google Scholar
Aiello, S., Barsella, B., Chlewicki, G., Greenberg, J.M., Patriarchi, P. and Perinotto, M., 1988, Astr. Ap., Suppl. Series, 73, 195.Google Scholar
Allison, A.C. and Dalgarno, A., 1970, Atomic Data, 1, 289.Google Scholar
Arquilla, R. and Goldsmith, P.F., 1985, Ap.J., 297, 436.Google Scholar
Cardelli, J.A., Clayton, G.C., Mathis, J.S., 1989, Ap.I., 345, 245.Google Scholar
de Boer, K.S., 1986, In: New Insights in Astronomy, ESA SP 263, 551.Google Scholar
Dickman, R.L., 1978, Ap.J. Suppl., 37, 407.Google Scholar
Draine, B.T., 1985, Private Communication Google Scholar
Flannery, B.P., Roberge, W.G. and Rybicki, G.P., 1980, Ap.J., 236, 598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, L. C., 1984, Ap.J., 282, 172.Google Scholar
Lillie, C.F. and Witt, A.N., 1976, Ap.J., 208, 64.Google Scholar
Mathis, I.S., 1990, Ann.Rev.Astr. Ap., 28, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, S.S. and Tarafdar, S.P., 1983, Ap.J., 267, 603.Google Scholar
Snell, R.L., 1981, Ap.J. Suppl., 45, 121.Google Scholar
Tiné, S., Aiello, S., Belleni, A. and Cecchi-Pestellini, C., IQSRT, in press.Google Scholar
van Dishoeck, E.F., 1987, in IAU Symposium No. 120, Astrochemistry, ed. Vardya, M.S. and Tarafdar, S.P. (Dordrecht: Reidel, pag. 51).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, W.R. and Yushak, W.M., 1983, Ap.J., 275, 391.Google Scholar