Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:21:03.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Possibilities of increasing the accuracy in the determination of refractional angles with Tengström's IDM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

J. Milewski
J. Milewski*
Affiliation:
Higher School of Engineering, Koszalin, Poland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The main purpose of the IDM research of prof. Tengström was to confirm the possibility of determining instrumentally the refraction angle in the field even over long distances.

An appreciable increase of the accuracy could only be achieved by further improvement of the instrument. Even with the first laboratory model it seems possible to achieve an increase of the accuracy in the final results. This paper discusses the above possibilities and proposes some methods to achieve this improvement in the accuracy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 89: Refractional Influences in Astrometry Andgeodesy , 1979 , pp. 249 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1979 

References

Angus-Leppan, P.V.: 1971, “Meteorological Physics Applied to the calculation of Refraction Corrections”. Conf. of Commonwealth Survey Officers, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Angus-Leppan, P.V., Webb, E.K.: 1971, “Turbulent Heat Transfer and Atmospheric Refraction”, General Ass. of IUGG, Moscow.Google Scholar
Born, M., Wolf, E.: 1959, “Principles of Optics”, Pergamon Press, London.Google Scholar
Brunner, F.K.: 1977, “Experimental Determination of the Coefficients of Refraction from Heat Flux Measurements”, Proc. of IAG Symposium, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Brunner, F.K., Fraser, C.S.: 1977, “An Atmospheric Turbulent Transfer Model for EDM Reduction”, Proc. of IAG Symposium, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Glissman, T.: 1977, “A Coincidence Method for Refraction Eliminating Angle Measurement”, Proc. of IAG Symposium, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Huggett, G.R.: 1978, Letter to prof. Tengström of July 12.Google Scholar
Huggett, G.R., Slater, L.E.: 1977, “Recent Advances in Multiwavelength Distance Measurement”, Proc. of IAG Symposium, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Prilepin, M.T.: 1974, “Elimination of Angular Refraction by means of Multiple-wavelength Method”, IAG Symposium, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Prilepin, M.T.: 1975, “Interferometer for Determination of Geodetic Refraction”, XVI General Ass. of IUGG, Grenoble, France.Google Scholar
Rinner, K.: 1977, “Meteorological Correction of Laser and Microwave Distances”, Proc. of IAG Symposium, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Saastamoinen, J.: 1974, “Theory and Calculation of Refraction Effects on Directions from Meteorological Information”, IAG Symposium, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Tengström, E.: 1967, “Elimination of Refraction at Vertical Angle Measurements using Laser of Different Wavelengths”, Proc. of the Int. Symposium on Figure of the Earth and Refraction, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Tengström, E.: 1974, Appendix to Dr Tengström's letter to Dr Brein, Jan. 10, 1969, concerning the influence of humidity on refraction determinations with the dual wavelength method, Proc. of IAG Symposium, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Tengström, E.: 1977, “Some Absolute Tests of the Results of IDM Measurements in the Field with a Description of Formulas used in the Tests”, Proc. of IAG Symposium, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Walsh, J.W.T.: 1953, “Photometry”, 2nd Edition, London.Google Scholar
Williams, D.C.: 1977, “First Field Tests of an Angular Dual Wavelength Instrument”, Proc. of IAG Symposium, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar