Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:29:08.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mass Loss from Eruptive Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

A. A. Boyarchuk
A. A. Boyarchuk*
Affiliation:
Krymskaya Astrofizicheskaya Observatoriya, U.S.S.R.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The previous reports by Lüst and by Pottasch concerned quasi-stationary mass loss. The loss is called quasi-stationary because the basic characteristics of a star, its temperature and its radius, do not change significantly during the time that a particle needs to flow from the stellar surface out to a point where the stellar influence is negligible. However there are many stars which show significant changes of temperature and radius within a short time. Very often these changes are accompanied by instantaneous ejection of a great amount of material. For example, during the outburst of a nova the ejected mass can reach 10−4M⊙. Such effects are very appreciable in the so-called ‘eruptive variables’, in which the brightness changes spasmodically. It is very likely that the rate and the mechanism of mass loss of eruptive variables are different from that of normal stars.

Type
Part II: Interaction of Stars and Interstellar Medium
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 39: Interstellar Gas Dynamics , 1970 , pp. 281 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1970 

References

Allen, C. W.: 1955, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 114, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyarchuk, A. A.: 1967, Astron. Zh. 44, 12 (1967, Soviet Astron. 11, 8).Google Scholar
Boyarchuk, A. A.: 1969, in Proc. Fourth IAU Colloquium on Variable Stars, Budapest, p. 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyarchuk, A. A.: 1970a, in Eruptive Stars, Nauka, Moscow, p. 113.Google Scholar
Boyarchuk, A. A.: 1970b, Astrofiz., in press.Google Scholar
Folkart, W., Pecker, J.-C., and Pottasch, S. R.: 1964, Ann. Astrophys. 27, 252.Google Scholar
Gauzit, J.: 1955, Ann. Astrophys. 18, 354.Google Scholar
Gershberg, R. E.: 1968, in Problems of the Stellar Evolution and Variable Stars, Nauka, Moscow, p. 50.Google Scholar
Gorbatskii, V. G.: 1970, in Eruptive Stars, Moscow, in press.Google Scholar
Grant, G. and Abt, H. A.: 1959, Astrophys. J. 129, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbig, G. H.: 1962, in Symposium on Stellar Evolution (ed. by Sahade, J.), Observatorio Astronómico, La Plata, Argentina, p. 23.Google Scholar
Huang, S. S.: 1956, Astron. J. 61, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, F. D.: 1969, Nature 222, 1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhi, L. V.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 140, 1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhi, L. V.: 1966, in Stellar Evolution (ed. by Stein, R. F. and Cameron, A. G. W.), Plenum Press. New York, p. 373.Google Scholar
Kukarkin, B. V.: 1954, Variable Stars and Stellar Evolution, Moscow.Google Scholar
Kunkel, W. E.: 1969, Nature 222, 1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovell, B.: 1969, Nature 222, 1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, P. W.: 1959, Astrophys. J. 129, 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mustel’, E. R. and Boyarchuk, A. A.: 1970, Astrophys. Space Sci. 6, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nather, R. E. and Warner, B.: 1969, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 143, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterbrock, D. E.: 1958, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 70, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pottasch, S. R.: 1959, Ann. Astrophys. 22, 394.Google Scholar
Sayer, A. R.: 1937, Ann. Harv. Coll. Observ. 105, 21.Google Scholar
Swings, P. and Struve, O.: 1940, Astrophys. J. 91, 546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varsavsky, C. M.: 1962, in Symposium on Stellar Evolution (ed. by Sahade, J.), Observatorio Astronómico, La Plata, Argentina, p. 33.Google Scholar
Walker, M. F. and Chincarini, G.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 154, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckermann, M.-C.: 1962, Ann. Astrophys. 24, 431.Google Scholar