Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T05:28:25.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnetic Field Generation in Protogalactic Halos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

Ralph E. Pudritz
Ralph E. Pudritz*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M1

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It has become quite clear that dynamically significant magnetic fields of order 10−6 Gauss are present in galactic halos (Perry, these Proceedings) at redshifts up to z ≥ 2. Comparable fields have been detected on cluster and even on supercluster scales (Giovannini, these Proceedings). The existence of such high fields is surprising because it is highly unlikely that primeval magnetic fields could have been much stronger than 10–18 Gauss. These observations require that there be an epoch of very vigorous dynamo action that can amplify this seed primordial field up to the observed values. Since strong fields are already in place by redshifts of z ≃ 2, this amplification process must operate very quickly. This argues against the idea that such fields could be generated on huge intercluster scales since the dynamical times are far too long. A much more promising site for the dynamo process is in the dark matter halos of young galaxies during the epoch of galaxy formation. The fundamental point is that vigorous dynamo action can take place in shocks that are expected to occur throughout the dark matter potential wells of protogalaxies (Pudritz and Silk 1989 (≡ PS), Pudritz 1989).

Type
10. Magnetic Fields at High Redshifts and in the Early Universe
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 140: Galactic and Intergalactic Magnetic Fields , 1990 , pp. 519 - 526
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1990 

References

Carlberg, R.G., and Couchman, H.M.P. 1989, Ap. J., 340, 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, L.L 1988, in The Post Combination Universe, N., Kaiser and A.N., Lasenby eds. (Kluwer: Dordrecht), 1.Google Scholar
Efstathiou, G. and Silk, J. 1983, Fund. Cosmic Physics, 9, 1.Google Scholar
Gunn, J.E. and Peterson, B.A. 1965, Ap. J., 142, 1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, F. 1949, in Problems of Cosmical Aerodynamics (Dayton, Ohio: Central Air Documents Office), 195.Google Scholar
Kaiser, N. 1984, Ap. J., 284, L9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K.-T., Kronberg, P.P., Giovanninni, G., and Venture, T. 1989, Nature, 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattanzio, J.C. et al 1985, M. N R. A. S., 215, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacClow, M.M., and Shull, J.M. 1986, Ap. J., 302, 585.Google Scholar
Mishustin, I.N., and Ruzmaikin, A.A. 1972, Soviet Phys-JETP, 34, 233.Google Scholar
Peebles, P.J.E. 1969, Ap. J., 155, 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pudritz, R.E. 1989, in Accretion Disks and Magnetic Fields in Astrophysics, Belvedere, G. ed. (Kluwer: Dordrecht), 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pudritz, R.E., and Silk, J. 1989, Ap. J., 342, 650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, M.J. 1988, in The Post Recombination Universe Kaiser, N. and Lasenby, A.N. eds. (Kluwer: Dordrecht), 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, J. 1983, J Vaiure, 301, 574.Google Scholar
White, S.D.M., and Rees, M.J. 1978, M. N. R. A. S., 183, 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, A. M. 1988, in QSO Absorption Lines, Blades, J.C., Turnshek, D., and Norman, C.A. eds. (Cambridge University Press: New York), 297.Google Scholar
Ze'dovich, Ya.B., and Novikov, I.D. 1983 in Relativistic Astrophysics II (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar