Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:33:03.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cross Wavelength Comparison of Images and Catalogs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

J.G. Bartlett
Affiliation:
Centre de Données astronomiques de Strasbourg, France
D. Egret
Affiliation:
Centre de Données astronomiques de Strasbourg, France

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We would like to start this discussion by attempting to make a useful, working distinction between catalogs and databases of astronomical objects. It seems to us that such a distinction could be made based upon the mode of access to the information: A catalog may be considered as a list of objects, almost invariably ordered by coordinates; a database, on the other hand, may be distinguished by its ability to extract a set of objects based on user-given criteria, such as all objects within a certain sky region with magnitudes brighter than m in the blue. Catalogs form the basis of the database, which adds the means of multi-criteria access to the information. In concrete terms, one usually thinks of SIMBAD, NED and LEDA as databases, while an ftp site containing electronic lists of objects may be thought of as a catalog storage warehouse.

Type
Part 9. Multi-Wavelength Cross Identification
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1998 

References

Bonnarel, et al. 1996, this volume, 469.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, et al. 1996, this volume, 450.Google Scholar
McGlynn, et al. 1996, this volume, 465.Google Scholar
Meyer, S.L. 1975, “Data Analysis for Scientists and Engineers,” John Wiley & Sons (New York).Google Scholar