Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:12:21.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Amplitude–Time Lag Relation for Emission-Line Flares of AGN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

Ivan I. Shevchenko*
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences Nab. Kutuzova 10, St. Petersburg 191187, Russia E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The amplitude–time lag (“ΔAt”) relation is considered in order to describe behaviour of the emission-line spectrum of an active galactic nucleus during a separate active event. Here ΔA, called the amplitude, is the maximum relative increment of the flux in a line, and Δt is the time lag between the maximum of the ionizing continuum flare and the maximum of the flare in a line. As suggested by Shevchenko (1988), the construction and analysis of such relations can be used to discriminate between broad-line region models. Comparison of theoretical “ΔAt” relations with the observed one composed by data for flares in various lines during a separate active event, is proved to be a useful tool for investigating the geometry of a broad-line region, for studies of the form of phase functions of a typical line-emitting cloud in various lines, as well as for clearing up the duration and amplitude of the initial flare in the ionizing continuum. The advantage of this method is that it utilizes the most general observed characteristics of the emission-line flares and nevertheless provides basic information on the allowed BLR models before the detailed modelling of emission-line light curves is performed.

Type
Variability
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1994 

References

Antonucci, R. R. J. and Cohen, R. D.: 1983, Astrophys. J. 271, 564.Google Scholar
Blandford, R. D. and McKee, C. F.: 1982, Astrophys. J. 255, 419.Google Scholar
Cherepashchuk, A. M. and Lyutyj, V. M.: 1973, Astrophys. Letters 13, 165.Google Scholar
Lyutyj, V. M.: 1977, Astron. Zh. 54, 1153. (Sov. Astron. 21, 655).Google Scholar
Lyutyj, V. M. and Cherepashchuk, A. M.: 1971, Astron. Tsirk. 633, 3.Google Scholar
Peterson, B. M.: 1993, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 105, 247.Google Scholar
Shevchenko, I. I.: 1984, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 10, 896 (Sov. Astron. Lett. 10, 377).Google Scholar
Shevchenko, I. I.: 1985a, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 11, 83 (Sov. Astron. Lett. 11, 35).Google Scholar
Shevchenko, I. I.: 1985b, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 11, 432 (Sov. Astron. Lett. 11, 178).Google Scholar
Shevchenko, I. I.: 1988, Astrofizika 28, 59 (Astrophysics 28, 35).Google Scholar
Ulrich, M.-H., et al.: 1984, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 206, 221.Google Scholar