Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T12:19:30.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Social and Economic Spread of Rural Lollardy: A Reappraisal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Derek Plumb
Derek Plumb*
Affiliation:
Corpus Christi College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The evidence given us by John Foxe in his Book of Martyrs provides more information about the social and theological standing of Lollards than we know about many later religious dissidents. Recent work has added to our knowledge. Geoffrey Dickens and Claire Cross have reconsidered the place of the Lollards in the development of the English Reformation, especially in theological matters. John Thomson drew our attention to the continuity shown in some areas. Claire Cross and Margaret Aston showed the importance of women Lollards. J.F. Davis has supported the idea of a continuous movement, and stressed the involvement of the remaining Lollard brotherhoods in the Reformation proper. Margaret Aston saw the reformers using Lollard texts to settle the Reformation into a tradition. And John Fines found one group of Lollards definitely not of a low or ‘middling sort’. But despite this attention on the part of historians, we still know little of the people labelled Lollards. How did they react to developments locally and nationally? Did they assimilate into their local communities despite their beliefs? What social and economic standing did they have? Was contemporary abuse, which dismissed them as ‘lowly sorts’, justified?

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Church History , Volume 23: Voluntary Religion , 1986 , pp. 111 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Acts and Monuments of John Foxe ed S.R. Cattley (London 1837) 8 vols.

2 Dickens, A.G., Lollards and Protestants in the diocese of York. 1509-1558 (Oxford 1959).Google Scholar

3 Cross, Claire, Church and People, 1450-1660 (London 1976).Google Scholar

4 Thomson, J.A.F., The Later Lollards, 1414-1520 (Oxford 1965).Google Scholar

5 Cross, Claire, ‘The great reasoners in Scripture: the activities of women Lollards, 1380-1530’, Medieval Women: Studies in Church History, Subsidia I (Oxford 1978).Google Scholar

6 Aston, Margaret, ‘Lollard women priests?’, Lollards and Reformers: Images and Literacy in late medieval religion (London 1984).Google Scholar

7 Davis, John F., Heresy and the Reformation in the south-east of England, 1520-1559 (London 1983).Google Scholar

8 Aston, Margaret, ‘Lollardy and the Reformation: Survival or Revival?’ History 49 (London 1964).Google Scholar

9 Fines, John, ‘Heresy trials in the diocese of Coventry and Lichfield, 1511-12’, JEH Google Scholar 14.

10 Foxe iv pp. 123-130; pp. 220-240.

11 Most of my information on the economic conditions in Buckinghamshire at this time is taken from The Agrarian History of England and Wales, 1500-1640 ed Joan Thirsk (Cambridge 1967); and Michael Reed, The Buckinghamshire Landscape (London 1979).

12 The Subsidy Roll for the county of Buckinghamshire. Anno. 1524 eds A.C. Chibnall and A. Vere Woodman (Aylesbury 1944).

13 Margaret Spufford, ‘Rural Cambridgeshire, 1520-1680’ (unpublished MA thesis, Leicester 1962) p. 58.

14 The Certificates of Musters for Buckinghamshire in 1522 ed A.C. Chibnall (London 1973).

15 M. Spufford, thesis cit., table V p. 80.

16 Cornwall, Julian, ‘English Country Towns in the Fifteen Twenties’, ECHR 2 ser 15 (1962-3) pp. 59–60.Google Scholar

17 Hoskins, W.G., The Age of Plunder: The England of Henry VIII, 1500-1547 (London 1976) pp. 36–42.Google Scholar

18 Bowker, Margaret, The Henrician Reformation: the diocese of Lincoln under John Longland, 1521-1547 (Cambridge 1981) pp. 48–9.Google Scholar

19 Foxe, iv p. 584.

20 Buckinghamshire Record Office (BRO), D/A/We/8/80.

21 BRO, D/A/Wf/6/163.

22 BRO, D/A/We/6/197.

23 Scarisbrick, J.J., The Reformation and the English People, (Oxford 1984) p. 6.Google Scholar

24 Foxe, iv p. 229.

25 Ibid. p. 235.

26 Ibid. p. 224.

27 Ibid. p. 237.

28 Ibid. p. 226.

29 Ibid. p. 240.

30 The Courts of the Archdeaconry of Buckingham, 1483-1523, ed E.M. Elvey pp. 389-90.

31 Chibnall, Musters pp. 226-274, 282-3.

32 BRO, D/A/We/6/398.

33 Foxe, iv p. 237.

34 Chibnall, Musters pp. 282-3.

35 Ibid. p. 230.

36 BRO, D/A/We/3/318.

37 BRO, D/A/Wf/2/299.

38 Foxe, v p. 454.

39 Ibid, iv p. 229.

40 Ibid.

41 Ibid.

42 Chibnall and Vere Woodman, Subsidy, p. 23.

43 Chibnall, A.C., Musters pp. 274–278.Google Scholar

44 BRO, D/A/We/6/55.

45 Foxe, iv p. 229; PRO, PROB 11/21 f 19.

46 Lathbury, R.H., The History of Denham, Buckinghamshire (Uxbridge 1904) p. 189.Google Scholar

47 Chibnall, and Woodman, Vere, Subsidy p. 17.Google Scholar

48 Chibnall, , Musters pp. 218–220.Google Scholar

49 Foxe, iv p. 231.

50 Chibnall and Vere Woodman, Subsidy, pp. 12-13.

51 Chibnall, Musters pp. 230-235.

52 PRO, PROB 11/21 f 28; 29, f.29, 33; BRO, D/A/We/9/3.

53 Chibnall, Musters pp. 230-255.

54 Chibnall and Vere Woodman, Subsidy pp. 24-5.

55 BRO, D/A/We/14/171.

56 Westminster Abbey Muniments 16905-6, 30501; West. Reg. bks ii, fol 161b, iv, fol 85; WAM 16810; Foxe, iv p. 178.

57 PRO, Prerogative Court Records, F.4. Spert.

58 Foxe, iv p. 226.

59 Ibid.

60 Ibid. p. 228.

61 Ibid. p. 230.

62 Chibnall, A.C. and Woodman, Vere, Subsidy p. 17.Google Scholar

63 Chibnall, A.C., Musters p. 218.Google Scholar

64 Elvey, E.M., Archdeaconry Court p. 112.Google Scholar

65 Lathbury, R.H., Denham p. 189.Google Scholar

66 Col LP, 1 g. 804.

67 PRO, STAC 1/17/155.

68 Foxe, iv p. 124.

69 Ibid. p. 123.

70 Ibid. pp. 220-2.

71 Ibid. p. 223.

72 Ibid. p. 224.

73 Ibid. p. 225.

74 Ibid. p. 228.

75 Chibnall and Vere Woodman, Subsidy pp. 12-13, 18, 19, 24-5, 26-7.

76 Chibnall, Musters pp. 224, 230, 216.

77 E.M. Elvey, Archdeaconry Court p. 295.

78 Ibid. p. 88.

79 BRO, D/A/We/2/52.

80 BRO, D/A/Wf/1/268.

81 BRO, D/A/We/12/150.

82 Bowker, Lincoln, p. 58.

83 Fines, J., ‘Heresy Trials’ pp. 162–3.Google Scholar