Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T20:22:45.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Personality and Intelligence in Assortative Mating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Sergio Escorial  and
Carmen Martín-Buro
Sergio Escorial*
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense (Spain)
Carmen Martín-Buro
Affiliation:
Centro de Enseñanza Superior Cardenal Cisneros (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Sergio Escorial. Departamento de Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, Facultad de Psicología, Despacho 2006-K, Campus de Somosaguas, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón. Madrid (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Assortative mating is the individuals' tendency to mate with those who are similar to them in some variables, at a higher rate than would be expected from random. This study aims to provide empirical evidence of assortative mating through the Big Five model of personality and two measures of intelligence using Spanish samples. The sample consisted of 244 Spanish couples. It was divided into two groups according to relationship time. The effect of age, educational level and socioeconomic status was controlled. The results showed strong assortative mating for intelligence and moderate for personality. The strongest correlations for Personality were found in Openness, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness.

El emparejamiento selectivo es la tendencia de los individuos a emparejarse con aquellos que son semejantes a ellos en ciertas variables, más de lo que cabría esperar por azar. El presente estudio pretende aportar evidencia empírica acerca del emparejamiento selectivo con muestras españolas a través del modelo Big Five de la personalidad y de dos medidas de inteligencia. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 244 parejas españolas, y fue dividida por el tiempo de relación en dos grupos. Se controló el efecto de la edad, el nivel académico y el nivel socioeconómico. Los resultados mostraron un fuerte emparejamiento selectivo en inteligencia y más moderado para la personalidad. Los rasgos de personalidad con mayores correlaciones fueron Apertura, Cordialidad y Responsabilidad.

Keywords

assortative matingintelligence and personalityemparejamiento selectivointeligencia y personalidad
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , July 2012 , pp. 680 - 687
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andres-Pueyo, A. (1997): Manual de psicología diferencial [Differential Psychology Manual]. Barcelona, Spain: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Andres-Pueyo, A., & Colom, R. (1998): Ciencia y politica de la inteligencia en la sociedad moderna [Science and politics of intelligence in modern society]. Madrid, Spain: Biblioteca Nueva.Google Scholar
Botwin, M. D., Buss, M. D., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Personality mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65, 107–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00531.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouchard, T. J., & McGue, M. (1981). Familial studies of intelligence: A review. Science, 212, 1055–1059. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.7195071CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, A. H. (1988). Personality: Evolunionarity heritage and human distinctiveness. Hilsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1984). Marital assortment for personality dispositions: Assessment with three different data sources. Behavior Genetics, 14, 111–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01076408CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colom, R. (1998): Psicología de las diferencias individuales. Teoría y práctica [Psychology of individual differences. Theory and practice]. Madrid, Spain: PirámideGoogle Scholar
Colom, R., Aluja-Fabregat, A., & García-López, O. (2002). Tendencias de emparejamiento selectivo en inteligencia, dureza de carácter, extraversión e inestabilidad emocional [Assortative mating trends in intelligence, strength of character, extraversión and emotional instability]. Psicothema, 14, 144–158Google Scholar
Colom, R., & Andres-Pueyo, A. (1999). El estudio de la inteligencia humana: Recapitulación ante el cambio de milenio [The study of human intelligence: Recapitulation before the turn of the millennium]. Psicothema, 11, 453–476.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2002). Inventario de personalidad NEO revisado (NEO PI-R): Inventario NEO reducido de cinco factores (NEO-FFI) [Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R): Reduced five factor NEO Inventory (NEO FFI)]. Madrid, Spain: TEA.Google Scholar
Díaz-Morales, J. F., Quiroga, M. A., Escribano, C., & Delgado, P. (2009). Emparejamiento selectivo en temperamento e inteligencia y su relación con la satisfacción marital [Assortative mating in temperament and intelligence and its relationship to marital satisfaction]. Psicothema, 21, 262–267.Google ScholarPubMed
Eaves, L. J., Fulker, D. W., & Heath, A. C. (1989). The effects of social homo-gamy and cultural inheritance on the covariances of twins and their parents: A LISREL model. Behavior Genetics, 19, 113–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eysenck, H., & Eysenck, M. (1985): Personalidad y diferencias individuales [Personality and individual differences]. Madrid, Spain: Piramide.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, D., & Baker, L. (1994). Spouse similarity in attitudes, personality and psychological well-being. Behavior Genetics, 24, 357–364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01067537CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figueredo, A. J., Sefcek, J. A., & Jones, D. N. (2006). The ideal romantic partner personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 431–441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, J. (1999). Searching for justice. American Psychologist, 54, 5–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.54.1.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber-Baldini, A. L., Schaie, K. W., & Willis, S. L. (1995). Similarity in married couples: A longitudinal study of mental abilities and rigidity-flexibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 191–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.69.1.191CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, A., Eaves, L., Nance, W., & Corey, L. (1987). Social inequality and assortative mating: Cause or consequence. Behavior Genetics, 17, 9–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01066007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrnstein, R., & Murray, C. (1994): The bell curve. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1978): Genetic and behavioral effects of nonrandom mating. In Abeelen, J. van (Ed.), Human variation: The biopsychology of age, race, and sex. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1998): The g factor. New York, NY: Prager.Google Scholar
Juan-Espinosa, M. (1997): Geografia de la inteligencia humana [Geography of human intelligence]. Madrid, Spain: Piramide.Google Scholar
Juan-Espinosa, M., & García, L. F. (2004). Nuestra personalidad. En qué y por qué somos diferentes [Our personality. How and why are we different]. Madrid, Spain: Biblioteca Nueva.Google Scholar
Luo, S., & Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and marital quality in newlyweds: A couple centered approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 304–326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.304CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lykken, D. T., & Tellegen, A. (1993). Is human mating adventitious or the result of lawful choice? A twin study of mate selection. Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 56–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.65.1.56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Schutte, N. S., Bhullar, N., & Rooke, S. E. (2010): The Five-Factor Model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A metaanalysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 124–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.09.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mare, R. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56, 15–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mascie-Taylor, C. (1989). Spouse similarity for IQ and personality and convergence. Behavior Genetics, 19, 223–227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01065906CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mascie-Taylor, C., & Vandenberg, S. (1988). Assortative mating for IQ and personality due to propinquity and personal preference. Behavior Genetics, 18, 339–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01260934CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr., Martin, T. A., Oryol, V. E., Rukavishnikov, A. A., & Senin, I. G. (2008). Personality trait similarity between spouses in four cultures. Journal of Research in Personality, 76, 1137–1163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00517.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagoshi, C. T., & Johnson, R. C. (1994). Phenotypic assortment versus social homogamy for personality, education, attitudes, and language use. Personality & Individual Differences, 17, 755–761. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90044-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, R. A., & Vandenberg, S. G. (1980). Spouse similarity in American and Swedish couples. Behavior Genetics, 10, 59–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01067319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qian, Z., & Preston, S. (1993). Changes in American marriage, 1972-1987: Availability and forces of attraction by age and education. American Sociological Review, 58, 482–495. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2096072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quiroga, M. A., & Navascués, V. (1995, July). Assessement of Buss' seven temperament dimensions: Spanish scales. Paper presented in the VII ISSID Meeting. Warsaw, Poland.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C. A., Baker, L. A., & Pedersen, N. L. (2000). Multivariate models of mixed assortment: Phenotypic assortment and social homogamy for education and fluid ability. Behavior Genetics, 30, 455–476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010250818089CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rushton, J. P., & Bons, T. A. (2005). Mate choice and friendship in twins. Psychological Science, 16, 555–559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01574.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tambs, K., Sundet, J. M., & Berg, K. (1993). Correlations between identical twins and their spouses suggest social homogamy for intelligence in Norway. Personality & Individual Differences, 14, 279–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90205-HCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L., & Thurstone, T. G. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Psychometric monographs 1. Madrid, Spain: TEA.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, S. G. (1972). Assortative mating, or who marries whom. Behavior Genetics, 2, 127–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D., Klohnen, E. C., Casillas, A., Simms, E. N., Haig, J., & Berry, D. S. (2004). Match makers and deal breakers: Analyses of assortative mating in newlywed couples. Journal of Personality, 72, 1029–1068. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00289.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watkins, M., & Meredith, W. (1981). Spouse similarity in newlyweds with respect to specific cognitive abilities, socioeconomic status and education. Behavior Genetics, 11, 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01065824CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed