Article contents
The Relation of the Incarnation to the Atonement
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
Extract
The New Testament interpretation of the Cross is the starting point for the doctrine of Incarnation and of Atonement. Their relationship is governed by the emergent elements, which are both central and permanent.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1963
References
page 68 note 1 E. Brunner, Der Mittler, p. 426.
page 68 note 2 K. Barth, K.D.IV.I, p. 164.
page 68 note 3 cf. A. W. Argyle, ‘NT Interpretation of the Death of Our Lord’, Exp. Ts., LX, pp. 253–6.
page 68 note 4 1 Cor. 5.7.
page 68 note 5 Rom. 3.25.
page 68 note 6 Rom. 3.25.
page 68 note 7 1 John 2.2.
page 68 note 8 Eph. 1.10.
page 68 note 9 2 Cor. 5.14.
page 68 note 10 1 Pet. 1.19.
page 69 note 1 Luke 4.17, 24.26.
page 69 note 2 Isa. 53.7, 10.
page 69 note 3 Heb. 2.17, 3.1f, 4.14.16, 5.5f, 6.20, 7.26, 8.1f, 9.11, 10.21.
page 69 note 4 Heb. 1.3, 2.17, 7.27, 9.11f, 14, 26, 10.1, 10, 12, 14, 19, 23, 12.24, 13.11f. 20f.
page 69 note 5 Heb. 10.14.
page 69 note 6 Heb. 9.24.
page 69 note 7 2 Cor. 5.21; Gal. 3.13.
page 69 note 8 Rom. 6.23.
page 69 note 9 1 Pet. 3.18.
page 69 note 10 Rom. 6.23.
page 69 note 11 cf. Rom. 3.21–26.
page 69 note 12 Gal. 1.4.
page 69 note 13 Gal. 4.1–7.
page 69 note 14 Gal. 3.13.
page 69 note 15 Gal. 3.19f. Cf. 2 Esdras 6.41, Wisd. of Sol. 13.1, for Jewish belief that the control of this world was committed for ‘this age’ to subordinate powers.
page 70 note 1 Acts 3.21.
page 70 note 2 Heb. 6.5.
page 70 note 3 Rom. 3.24; 1 Cor. 6.20.
page 70 note 4 Eph. 1.14.
page 70 note 5 Rev. 7.16, 21.4.
page 70 note 6 Mark 10.45; Matt. 20.28.
page 70 note 7 Eph. 2.14–16.
page 70 note 8 Col. 2.14, 15.
page 70 note 9 Acts 2.24, 36; 1 Cor. 15.17; cf. 1 Cor. 15.57, ‘Thanks be to God which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.’
page 70 note 10 2 Cor. 5.18–20.
page 71 note 1 1 John 4.19.
page 71 note 2 2 Cor. 5.19.
page 71 note 3 Col. 1.21, 22.
page 71 note 4 2 Cor. 1.22, 5.3.
page 71 note 5 cf. Argyle, op. cit., p. 255.
page 71 note 6 cf. Heb. 10.9.
page 71 note 7 cf. 1 Cor. 15.56–57.
page 72 note 1 cf. Barth, C.D.IV.2, p. 55 h II.
page 72 note 2 cf. Barth, C.D.IV.2, p. 25.
page 72 note 3 Brunner, , The Mediator, p. 318.Google Scholar
page 73 note 1 ibid., p. 347.
page 73 note 2 Bultmann, R., Jesus and the Word, p. 19.Google Scholar
page 73 note 3 Brunner, , The Mediator, p. 167.Google Scholar
page 73 note 4 ibid., p. 363.
page 73 note 5 Rom. 6.4; Col. 2.12.
page 74 note 1 Heb. 1.3.
page 74 note 2 Barth, , K.D.IV.2, p. 235.Google Scholar
page 74 note 3 cf. Barth, , C.D.IV.1, p. 59, 3.Google Scholar
page 74 note 4 Heb. 2.17.
page 74 note 5 Heb. 5.8.
page 74 note 6 Heb. 4.15.
page 74 note 7 Barth, , K.D.IV.1, p. 164.Google Scholar
page 74 note 8 Heb. 2.16.
page 75 note 1 The Mediator, p. 471.
page 75 note 2 cf. Barth, , C.D.IV.2, p. 250.Google Scholar
page 75 note 3 cf. Brunner, , The Mediator, p. 474.Google Scholar
page 75 note 4 Brunner, , Der Mittler, p. 442.Google Scholar
page 75 note 5 Barth, , C.D.IV.1, p. 296.Google Scholar
page 76 note 1 Mark 10.45.
page 76 note 2 John 10.11, 15, 17.
page 76 note 3 Matt. 26.28.
page 76 note 4 Isa. 1.2–4.
page 76 note 5 Barth, , C.D.IV.2, p. 45.Google Scholar
page 76 note 6 Brunner, , Der Mittler, p. 499.Google Scholar
page 76 note 7 Heb. 4.12.
page 77 note 1 Brunner, , The Mediator, p. 522.Google Scholar
page 77 note 2 Rev. 1.17, 2.8.
page 77 note 3 cf. Barth, , C.D.IV.1, p. 324.Google Scholar
page 77 note 4 Heb. 7.25.
page 77 note 5 Heb. 10.14.
page 77 note 6 Heb. 9.12.
page 77 note 7 Heb. 5.6, 6.20, 7.17.
- 2
- Cited by