Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:24:28.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Models of Critique: Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Yemima Ben-menahem  and
Adi Ophir
Yemima Ben-menahem
Affiliation:
Program in the History and Philosophy of ScienceThe Hebrew University of Jerusalem (Y.B.)
Adi Ophir
Affiliation:
The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas (A.O.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Critique involves reflection, specifically self-reflection, and as such it is inherently linked with philosophy. Critique calls for change, awareness, liberation from false conceptions, and reshaping of spheres of action and belief. Consequently it is closely linked with the moral and the political. Critique aspires to enhance truth, beauty, and justice and is thus an integral part of science, art, and social action. The present volume tackles issues of critique through a selection of papers originally presented at the workshop on “Models of Critique in the Sciences, Society, and the Arts,” held in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv during May 1996. As the full program indicates, this selection provides only a partial picture of the topics discussed at the workshop. A major consideration has been the publication policy of Science in Context, with its emphasis on science, which is reflected here. We wish to express our gratitude to all the participants for their presentations and contributions to a stimulating exchange of ideas.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , Spring 1997 , pp. 3 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kant, I. 1965. The Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Smith, Norman Kemp. New York: St. Martin Press.Google Scholar
Knox, T. M. 1967. Hegel's Philosophy of Right. Translated and annotated. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J.-F. 1988. The Différend: Phrases in Dispute, trans. Abbeele, G.V.D.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Plato, , The Republic.Google Scholar
Plato, , The Symposium.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1993. “Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough.“ In Philosophical Occasions, ed. Klagge, and Nordman, . Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar