Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T06:05:01.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hunting the White Elephant: When and How did Galileo Discover the Law of Fall?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Jürgen Renn ,
Peter Damerow ,
Simone Rieger  and
Domenico Giulini
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present a number of findings concerning Galileo's major discoveries which question both the methods and the results of dating his achievements by common historiographic criteria. The dating of Galileo's discoveries is, however, not our primary concern. This paper is intended to contribute to a critical reexamination of the notion of discovery from the point of view of historical epistemology. We claim that the puzzling course of Galileo's discoveries is not an exceptional comedy of errors but rather illustrates the normal way in which scientific progress is achieved. We argue that scientific knowledge generally develops not as a sequence of independent discoveries accumulating to a new body of knowledge but rather as a network of interdependent activities which only as a whole makes the individual steps understandable as meaningful “discoveries.”

Type
1. The Context of the Practioners: Mechanics and its New Objects
Information
Science in Context , Volume 13 , Issue 3-4 , Autumn-Winter 2000 , pp. 299 - 419
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abattouy, M. 1996. Galileo's Manuscript 72: Genesis of the New Science of Motion (Padua ca. 1600–1609). Preprint 48. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for the History of Science.Google Scholar
Allegretti, G. 1992. Monte Baroccio: 1513–1799. Mombaroccio: Commune di Mombaroccio.Google Scholar
Arend, G. 1998. Die Mechanik des Niccolò Tartaglia im Kontext der zeitgenössis-chen Erkenntnis- und Wissenschaftstheorie. München: Institut für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, D. 1992. “Guidobaldo dal Monte and the Archimedean Revival”. Nuncius 7:3–34.Google Scholar
Biagioli, M. 1989. “The Social Status of Italian Mathematicians 1450–1600”. History of Science 27:41–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerota, M. 1992. Gli Scritti De Motu Antiquiora di Galileo Galilei: II Ms. Gal. 71. Un′analisi storico-critica. Cagliari: Cooperativa Universitaria.Google Scholar
Caverni, R. 1972. Storia del metodo sperimentale in Italia. New York: Johnson Reprint.Google Scholar
Damerow, P., Freudenthal, G., McLaughlin, P., and Renn, J.. 1992. Exploring the Limits of Preclassical Mechanics. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damerow, P., and Renn, J.. 1998. “Galileo at Work: His Complete Notes on Motion in an Electronic Representation”. Nuncius 13:781–789.Google Scholar
del Monte, G. ca. 1587–1592. Meditantiunculae Guidi Ubaldi e marchionibus Montis Santae Mariae de rebus mathematicis. Paris: Bibliothèque Nationale de Paris, Manuscript, Catalogue No., Lat. 10246.Google Scholar
di Pasquale, S. 1996. L'arte del costruire. Venice: Marsilio.Google Scholar
Drake, S. 1973. “Galileo's Discovery of the Law of Free Fall”. Scientific American 228:84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, S. 1979. “Galileo's Notes on Motion Arranged in Probable Order of Composition and Presented in Reduced Facsimile”. Annali dell'lstituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza.Google Scholar
Drake, S. 1987. Galileo at Work: His Scientific Biography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Drake, S. 1990. Galileo: Pioneer Scientist. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Drake, S., and Drabkin, I. E.. 1969. Mechanics in Sixteenth-Century Italy. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Favaro, A. 1919–1920. “Scritture Galileiane apocrife”. Atti e memorie della R. Accademia di scienze lettere ed arti in Padova 36:17–29.Google Scholar
Favaro, A. 1966. Galileo Galilei e lo studio di Padova. Padova: Antenore.Google Scholar
Fredette, R. 1969. Les De Motu “plus anciens” de Galileo Galilei: prolégomènes. Ph.D.diss. Montreal: University of Montreal.Google Scholar
Galilei, G. 1890–1909. Le opere di Galileo Galilei. Edizione Nazionale, ed. Favaro, A.. Florence.Google Scholar
Galilei, G. 1958. Discorsi e dimonstrazioni matematiche intorno a due nuove scienze attinenti alla mecanica ed i movimenti locali, ed. Carugo, A. and Geymonat, L.. Torino: Boringhieri.Google Scholar
Galilei, G. 1960. On Motion and On Mechanics: Comprising De Motu (ca. 1590). Madison: University of Madison.Google Scholar
Galilei, G. 1967. Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, ed. Drake, S.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Galilei, G. 1974. Two New Sciences, ed. Drake, S.. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Galilei, G. 1989. Two New Sciences (2 ed.), ed. Drake, S.. Toronto: Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Galilei, G. after 1638. Discorsi (annotated copy of Galileo). Florence: Biblioteca Nazio-nale Centrale, Florence, Manuscript, Ms. Gal. 79.Google Scholar
Galilei, G. ca. 1602–1637. Notes on Motion. Florence: Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale, Florence, Manuscript, Ms. Gal. 72.Google Scholar
Galluzzi, P. 1979. Momento. Rome: Ateneo e Bizzarri.Google Scholar
Gamba, E. 1995. “Guidobaldo dal Monte tecnologo”. Pesaro città e contà: rivista della società pesarese di studi storici 5:99–106.Google Scholar
Gamba, E., and Montebelli, V.. 1988. Le scienze a Urbino nel tardo rinascimento. Urbino: Quattro Venti.Google Scholar
Gamba, E., and Montebelli, V.. 1989. Galileo Galilei e gli scienziati del ducato di Urbino. Urbino: Quattro-venti.Google Scholar
Gillispie, C. C. (ed.). 1981. Dictionary of Scientific Biography. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Giuntini, L., Lucarelli, F., Mandò, P. A., Hooper, W., and Barker, P. H.. 1995. “Galileo's writings: chronology by PIXE”. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 95:389–392.Google Scholar
Giusti, E. 1993. Euclides reformatus: la teoria delle proporzioni nella scuola galileiana. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
Hooper, W. E. 1992. Galileo and the Problems of Motion. Ph.D.diss. indiana: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Klemm, F. 1964. Der junge Galilei und seine Schriften “De motu” und “Le mecaniche”. In Brü;che, E. (ed.), Sonne steh still: 400 Jahre Galileo Galilei, 6881Mosbach: Physik Verlag.Google Scholar
Koyré, A. 1966. Etudes Galiléennes. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, W. 1978. Naturtheorie und Produktionsweise. Darmstadt: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Libri, G. 1838. Histoire des Sciences Mathématiques en Italie, vol. 4. Paris: Renouardi.Google Scholar
Micheli, G. 1992. Guidobaldo del Monte e la meccanica. In Conti, L. (ed.), La matematizzazione dell'universo, 87–104S. Maria degli Angeli - Assisi: Porziun-cola.Google Scholar
Miniati, M., Greco, V., Molesini, G., and Quercioli, F.. 1994. “Examination of an Antique Telescope”. Nuncius 9:677–682.Google Scholar
Naylor, R. H. 1974. “The Evolution of an Experiment: Guidobaldo Del Monte and Galileo's “Discorsi” Demonstration of the Parabolic Trajectory” Physis 16:323–346.Google Scholar
Naylor, R. H. 1975. “An Aspect of Galileo's Study of the Parabolic Trajectory”. ISIS 66:394–396.Google Scholar
Naylor, R. H. 1976a. “Galileo: the Search for the Parabolic Trajectory”. Annales of Science 33:153–172.Google Scholar
Naylor, R. H. 1976b. “Galileo: Real Experiment and Didactic Demonstration”. ISIS 67:398–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, R. H. 1977. “Galileo's Theory of Motion: Processes of Conceptual Change in the Period 1604–1610”. Annales of Science 34:365–392.Google Scholar
Naylor, R. H. 1980a. “Galileo's Theory of Projectile Motion”. ISIS 71:550–570.Google Scholar
Naylor, R. H. 1980b. “The Role of Experiment in Galileo's Early Work on the Law of Fall”. Annales of Science 37:363–378.Google Scholar
Naylor, R. H., and Drake, S. 1983. “Discussion on Galileo's Early Experiments on Projectile Trajectories”. Annales of Science 40:391–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porz, H. 1994. Galilei und der heutige Mathematikunterricht. Ursprüngliche Fes-tigkeitslehre und Ähnlichkeitsmechanik und ihre Bedeutung für die mathema-tische Bildung. Mannheim: B.I. Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Remmert, V. R. 1998. Ariadnefädden im Wissenschaftslabyrinth: Studien zu Galilei: Historiographie - Mathematik - Wirkung. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Sarpi, P. 1996. Pensieri naturali, metafisici e matematici, ed. Cozzi, L. and Sosio, L.. Milano: Ricciardi.Google Scholar
Schneider, I. 1970. Der Proportionalzirkel, ein universelles Analogrecheninstru-ment der Vergangenheit. München: Deutsches Museum.Google Scholar
Settle, T. B. 1961. “An Experiment in the History of Science”. Science 133:19–23.Google Scholar
Settle, T. B. 1971. Ostilio Ricci, a Bridge between Alberti and Galileo. In XII Congrès International d′Histoire des Sciences, Actes., vol. IIIB. Paris: Blanchard.Google Scholar
Settle, T. B. 1996. Galileo's Experimental Research. Preprint 54. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for the History of Science.Google Scholar
Sommerfeld, A. 1994 Reprint. Mechanik (8 ed.). Vorlesungen iiber theoretische Physik, ed. Fues, E., vol. 1. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsch.Google Scholar
Takahashi, K. i. 1993a. “Galileo's Labyrinth: His Struggle for Finding a Way out of His Erroneous Law of Natural Fall. Part 1”. Historia Scientarum 2–3:169–202.Google Scholar
Takahashi, K. i. 1993b. “Galileo's Labyrinth: His Struggle for Finding a Way out of His Erroneous Law of Natural Fall. Part 2”. Historia Scientarum 3–1:1–34.Google Scholar
Tampone, G. 1996. Il restauro delle strutture di legno. Milano: Ulrico Hoepli.Google Scholar
Tartaglia, N. 1984. La Nova Scientia. Bologna: Forni.Google Scholar
Torricelli, E. 1919. De motu gravium naturaliter descendentium, et projectorum. In Loria, G. and Vassura, G. (ed.), Opera di Evangelista Torricelli., vol. 2. Faenza: Montanari.Google Scholar
Viviani, V. 1674. Quinto libro degli Elementi di Euclide, ovvero scienza univer-sale delle proporzioni, spiegata colla dottrina del Galileo. Florence: Condotta.Google Scholar
Viviani, V. after 1638. Notes on Mechanical Problems. Florence: Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale, Florence, Manuscript, Ms. Gal. 227.Google Scholar
Wohlwill, E. 1899. “Die Entdeckung der Parabelform der Wurflinie”. Abhandlun-gen zur Geschichte der Mathematik 9:577–624.Google Scholar
Wohlwill, E. 1993. Galilei und sein Kampf für die Copernicanische Lehre. Vaduz: Sändig.Google Scholar
Working-Group. 1996. Pilot Study for a Systematic PIXE Analysis of the Ink Types in Galileo's Ms. 72: Project Report No. 1. Preprint 54. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for the History of Science.Google Scholar
Zupko, R. E. 1981. Italian Weights and Measures from the Middle Ages to the Nineteeth Century. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar