Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:42:12.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Locke, Steiner and Understanding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2010

M. A. Stewart
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Professor Parkinson in his lecture on ‘The Translation Theory of Understanding’ (pp. 1–19 above) discusses two stages in the development of a false but influential tradition which he finds common to Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding and Professor George Steiner's After Babel. He is not, of course, alleging any direct historical influence of the one on the other; neither is he principally addressing Steiner's book as a whole, but rather the account of understanding upon which it appears to be founded. I should like to take his paper as the starting-point for my own, but begin from a somewhat broader view than he does of the legacy of Locke. With Parkinson's constructive position I have no quarrel, and I shall not address myself directly to it.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 10 , March 1976 , pp. 20 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alston, W.P.Philosophy of Language (1964), Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Austin, J.L.How to Do Things with Words (1975), Second edition, ed. Urmson, J. O. & M., Sbisà. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D.Aspects of Language (1968), New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Crystal, D.Linguistics (1971), Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Flew, A. G. N., Ed. Logic and Language, 1st Series (1951), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fowler, R.Understanding Language: an Introduction to Linguistics (1974), London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Frye, M.‘On saying’. American Philosophical Quarterly, 13 (1976, 123–7).Google Scholar
Hacking, I.M.Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? (1975), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. A.Introductory Linguistics (1964), Philadelphia: Chilton.Google Scholar
Hall, R. A.An Essay on Language (1968), Philadelphia: Chilton.Google Scholar
Holdcroft, D.‘Meaning and illocutionary acts’. Ratio, 6, (1964, 128–43). Repr. in Parkinson (1968).Google Scholar
Landesman, C.‘Locke's theory of meaning’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 14 (1976, 23–35).Google Scholar
Lewis, H. D., Ed. Contemporary British Philosophy: Fourth Series (1976), London, Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Locke, J.An Essay Concerning Human Understanding [1st ed., 1690] (1975), Ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Parkinson, G. H. R., Ed. The Theory of Meaning (1968), London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, G.After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation (1975), London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yolton, J. W.‘On being present to the mind: a sketch for the history of an idea’. Dialogue, 14. (1975, 373–88).CrossRefGoogle Scholar