Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T13:30:34.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Roseoau's contribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

Steve Smith
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For anyone interested in tracing the development of the comparative study of foreign policy behaviour the work of James Rosenau is central. His work in the 1960s was a major impetus in the formation of an identifiable research community in the United States; and the problems which he has addressed since that time have been the problems of comparative foreign policy analysis writ large. Above all, his work, exactly because it has attracted such sustained and widespread attention, has served as a focal point for a critique of the very possibility of the comparative analysis of foreign policy behaviour. Like it or loathe it, Rosenau's work represents the clearest and most extensive example of the comparative foreign policy school of thought.

Type
Review articles
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , April 1983 , pp. 137 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Reprinted in The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy, op. cit., pp. 115–69.

2. Ibid., pp. 118–19.

3. Ibid.

4. Ibid., p. 133.

5. Ibid., p. 132 (footnote 45).

6. Ibid., p. 130 (footnote 44).

7. Ibid.

8. Ibid., pp.370–401.

9. Ibid., pp.461–500.

10. Ibid., pp. 242–82.

11. Ibid., DD.317–38.

12. Ibid., pp. 339–67.

13. See, for example, Rosenau, J. (ed.), Comparing Foreign Policies (New York, 1974).Google Scholar

14. See ‘Puzzlement in foreign policy’, in Rosenau, , The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy, op. cit., pp. 231–9.Google Scholar

15. Ibid., pp. 231–2.

16. See Rosenau, J. N. (ed.), Linkage Politics (New York, 1969)Google Scholar, and Rosenau, J. N. (ed.), Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy (New York, 1967).Google Scholar

17. Rosenau, The Study of Global Interdependence, op. cit.

18. See ‘The concepts of aggregation and third world demands: an analytic opportunity and an empirical challenge’, Ibid., pp. 129–61.

19. Ibid., p. 7.

20. ‘International studies in a transnational world’, Ibid., pp. 11–34.

21. See ‘Theorizing Across Systems: Linkage Politics Revisited’, Ibid., pp. 162–94.

22. Rosenau, The Study of Political Adaptation, op. cit.

23. Ibid., pp. 199–218.

24. Ibid., pp. 56–87, and pp. 88–101.

25. See Table 4–3 Ibid., p. 81.

26. See Smith, S. M., Foreign Policy Adaptation (Faraborough, 1981).Google Scholar For a summary of the findings, see Smith, S. M.‘Rosenau's Adaptive Behaviour Approach’, Review of International Studies, vii (1981), pp. 107–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27. See Rosenau, , The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy, op. cit., pp. vi–vii.Google Scholar