Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:01:20.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ariosto and the “Fier Pastor”: Form and History in Orlando Furioso

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Albert Russell Ascoli
Albert Russell Ascoli*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay explores the formal means (a variant of the medieval romance technique of entrelacement) by which Ludovico Ariosto's Orlando Furioso represents and comments on contemporary events, particularly the threats posed by French and Spanish invasions and by the interventionist politics of Popes Julius II and Leo X. Ariosto's treatment of the latter figure exemplifies both the specificity of the interplay between form and history in the Furioso Innamorato and its innovative character with respect to precursors, notably Boiardo's Orlando Innamorato. A final section considers the changing significance of such topical material between the first edition of 1516 (when Leo was alive) and the final edition of 1532 (long after Leo's death, and under very different historical circumstances).

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , Summer 2001 , pp. 487 - 522
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnelli, Giuseppe, and Giuseppe Ravegnani. 1933. Annali delle edizioni ariostee. 2 vols. Bologna.Google Scholar
Alighieri, Dante. 1966. La Commedia secondo I'antica vulgata. Ed. Giorgio Pettocchi. Milan.Google Scholar
Anceschi, Giuseppe, and Tina Matarrese, eds. 1998. II Boiardo e ilmondo estense nel Quattrocento. 2 vols. Padua.Google Scholar
Ariosto, Ludovico. 1954. Satire. In Opere minori. Ed. Cesare Segre. Milan and Naples.Google Scholar
Ariosto, Ludovico. 1960. Orlando furioso. Eds. Santorre Debenedetti and Cesare Segre. Bologna.Google Scholar
Ariosto, Ludovico. 1965. Lettere. Ed. Angelo Stella. Verona.Google Scholar
Ariosto, Ludovico. 1982. Orlando furioso. Ed. Emilio Bigi. 2 vols. Milan.Google Scholar
Ascoli, Albert Russell. 1987. Ariosto's Bitter Harmony: Crisis and Evasion in the Italian Renaissance. Princeton.Google Scholar
Ascoli, Albert Russell. 1993. “Machiavelli's Gift of Counsel.” In Machiavelli and the Discourse of Literature, eds. A. R. Ascoli and V. Kahn, 219-57. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Ascoli, Albert Russell. 1998. “II segreto di Erittonio: politica e poetica sessuale nel canto XXXVII dell’ Orlando furioso.” In La rappresentazione dell'altro nei testi del Rinascimento, ed. Sergio Zatti, 53-76. Lucca.Google Scholar
Ascoli, Albert Russell. 2000a. “Ariosto.” In The Dante Encyclopedia, ed. Richard Lansing, 60-64. New York.Google Scholar
Ascoli, Albert Russell. 2000b. “Faith as Cover-Up: Ariosto's Orlando furioso, Canto 21, and Machiavellian Ethics.” I Tatti Studies: Essays in the Renaissance 8 (1999 [2000]): 135-170.Google Scholar
Bacchelli, Riccardo. 1958. La congiura di Don Giulio d'Este. 2nd ed. Milan.Google Scholar
Baillet, Roger. 1982. “L'Ariosto e le princes d'Este: poésie et politique.” In Lepouvoir et le plume, 85-95. Paris.Google Scholar
Baldan, Paolo. 1983. Metamorfosi di un orco: un'irruzione foclorica nel Boiardo esorcizzata dallAriosto. Milan.Google Scholar
Beer, Marina. 1987. Romanzi di cavalleria: il “Furioso “ e il romanzo italiano del primo Cinquecento. Rome.Google Scholar
Benson, Pamela. 1992. The Invention of Renaissance Woman. University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Bertoni, Giulio. 1903. La Biblioteca estense e la colturaferrarese ai tempi del Duca Ercole I (1471-1505). Turin.Google Scholar
Bigi, Emilio. 1982. “Inttoduzione.” In Ariosto, 1982, 7-70.Google Scholar
Biow, Douglas. 1996. “Mirahile Dictu“: Representation of the Marvelous in Medieval and Renaissance Epic. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Blasucci, Luigi. 1969. “La Commedia come fonte linguistica e stilistica del Furioso. “ In Studi su Dante e Ariosto, 121-62. Naples and Milan.Google Scholar
Boiardo, Matteo Maria. 1989. Orlando innamorato. Trans. Charles Ross. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Boiardo, Matteo Maria. 1995. Orlando innamorato. Ed. Riccardo Bruscagli. 2 vols. Turin.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge. First published in French, 1972.Google Scholar
Bruscagli, Riccardo. 1983. “'Ventura’ e ‘inchiesta’ fra Boiardo e Ariosto.” In Stagioni della civilta estense, 87-126. Pisa.Google Scholar
Bruscagli, Riccardo. 1995. “ Introduzione. “ In Boiardo, 1995, v-xxxiii.Google Scholar
Cabani, Maria Cristina. 1990. Costanti ariostesche: techniche della ripresa e memoria interna nell “Orlando furioso. “ Pisa.Google Scholar
Campbell, Stephen J. 1977. Cosme Tura of Ferrara: Style, Politics, and the Renaissance City, 1450-1495. New Haven.Google Scholar
Carne-Ross, D. S. 1966. “The One and the Many: A Reading of Orlando Furioso, Cantos 1 and 8.” Arion O.S. 5: 195–234 Google Scholar
Carne-Ross, D. S. 1976. “The One and the Many: A Reading of Orlando Furioso.” Arion N.S. 3: 146–219.Google Scholar
Caretti, Lanfranco. 1976. “Codicillo ariostesco.” In Antichi e moderni, Torino. 103-09.Google Scholar
Casadei, Alberto. 1988a. “Alcune considerazioni sui Cinque canti.” Giornale storico della letteratura italiana 165: 161–79.Google Scholar
Casadei, Alberto. 1988b. La strategia delle varianti: le correzioni storiche del terzo “Furioso.” Lucca.Google Scholar
Casadei, Alberto. 1992. “Brevi analisi sui finale del primo Furioso.” Studi eproblemi di critica testuale 44: 87–100.Google Scholar
Catalano, Michele. 1930-1931. VitadiLudovico Ariosto. 2 vols. Geneva.Google Scholar
Cavallo, Jo Ann. 1993. Boiardo's ‘Orlando innamorato': An Ethics of Desire. Rutherford, NJ.Google Scholar
Cavallo, Jo Ann. 1998. “Denying Closure: Ariosto's Rewriting of the Orlando innamorato.” In Cavallo and Ross, 97-134.Google Scholar
Cavallo, Jo Ann, and Charles Ross, eds. 1998. Fortune and Romance: Boiardo in America. Tempe.Google Scholar
Ceserani, Remo. 1984. “Due modelli cultural! e narrativi nel!Orlando furioso.” Giornale storico della letteratura italiana 161: 481–506.Google Scholar
Chiappini, Luciano. 1967. Gli Estensi. Modena.Google Scholar
Cranston, Jody. 1998. “Commemoration, Self-Representation, and the Fiction of Constancy in Este Court Portrayal.” In Cavallo and Ross, 271-77.Google Scholar
Dalla Palma, Giuseppe. 1984. Le strutture narrative delV'Orlando furioso. “ Florence.Google Scholar
Delcorno-Branca, Daniela. 1973. L'“Orlando furioso “ e il romanzo cavalleresco medievale. Florence.Google Scholar
Dionisotti, Carlo. 1961. “Appunti sui Cinque canti e sugli studi ariosteschi.” In Studi e problemi di critica testuale, ed. Commissione per i testi di lingua, 368-82. Bologna.Google Scholar
Dionisotti, Carlo. 1967. Geografia e storia della letteratura italiana. Turin.Google Scholar
Donato, Eugenio. 1986. “'Per selve e boscherecci labirinti': Desire and Narrative Structure in Ariosto's Orlando furioso.” In Literary Theory/Renaissance Texts, eds. Patricia Parker and David Quint, 33-62. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Durling, Robert. 1965. The Figure of the Poet in Renaissance Epic. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Margaret. 1983. Trials of Desire: Renaissance Defenses of Poetry. New Haven.Google Scholar
Finucci, Valeria. 1992. The Lady Vanishes: Subjectivity and Representation in Castiglione and Ariosto. Stanford.Google Scholar
Finucci, Valeria. ed. 1999. Renaissance Transactions: Ariosto and Tasso. Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Fichter, Andrew. 1982. Poets Historical: Dynastic Epic in the Renaissance. New Haven.Google Scholar
Fortini, Franco. 1975. “I silenzi dell'Ariosto.” Rassegna della letteratura italiana 69:12-14.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York.Google Scholar
Fumagalli, Edoardo. 1988. “II volgarizzamento di Erodoto.” In Anceschi and Matarrese, 329-428.Google Scholar
Giamatti, A. Bartlett. 1976. “Headlong Horses, Headless Horsemen: An Essay in the Chivalric Romances of Pulci, Boiardo, and Ariosto.” In Italian Literature: Roots and Branches, eds. K. Atchity and G. Rimanelli, 265-307. New Haven.Google Scholar
Gragnolati, Manuele. 1998. “Love, Lust, and Avarice: Leodilla between Dante and Ovid.” In Cavallo and Ross, 151-73.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. 1988. Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Gundersheimer, Werner. 1973. Ferrara: The Style of a Renaissance Despotism. Princeton.Google Scholar
Henderson, Robert Davey. 1995. “The First Orlando furioso: Compositional Seasons and Political Strategies.” Ph.D., diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Katherine. 1992. “The Court in the Work of Art: Patronage and Poetic Autonomy in the Orlando furioso, Canto 42.” Quaderni d'ltalianistica 13.1: 113–24.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Katherine. 1999. “'Un cosl valoroso cavalliere': Knightly Honor and Artistic Representation in Orlando furioso, C a n t o 2 6 . “ In Finucci, 1999, 178-212.Google Scholar
The Holy Bible. Translated From the Latin Vulgate and diligently compared with other editions in divers languages (Douai, A.D. 1609; Rheims, A.D. 1582). Belgium, 1964.Google Scholar
Javitch, Daniel. 1980. “Cantus Interruptus in the Orlando furioso.” MLN 95: 66-80.Google Scholar
Javitch, Daniel. 1984. “The Orlando furioso and Ovid's Revision of the Aeneid.” MLN 99: 1023–36.Google Scholar
Javitch, Daniel. 1985. “The Imitation of Imitations in Orlando furioso? Renaissance Quarterly 38: 215–39.Google Scholar
Javitch, Daniel. 1988. “Narrative Discontinuity in the Orlando furioso and its Sixteenth Century Critics.” MLN \03: 50-74.Google Scholar
Javitch, Daniel. 1999. “The Grafting of Virgilian Epic in Orlando furioso.” In Finucci, 1999, 56-76.Google Scholar
Johnson-Haddad, Miranda. 1992. “Gelosia: Ariosto reads Dante.” Stanford Italian Review. 11:187-201.Google Scholar
La Monica, Stefano. 1985. “Realta storica e immaginario bellico ariostesco.” Rassegna della letteratura italiana 89: 326–58.Google Scholar
La Monica, Stefano. 1992. “La politica estense nel Furioso e negli Ecatommiti.” Rassegna della letteratura italiana 96: 66–83.Google Scholar
Looney, Dennis. 1990-1991. “Ariosto's Ferrara: A National Identity between Fact and Fiction.” Comparative and General Literature 39: 25–34.Google Scholar
Looney, Dennis. 1996. Compromising the Classics: Romance Epic Narrative in the Italian Renaissance. Detroit.Google Scholar
Looney, Dennis. 1998. “Erodoto dalle Storie al romanzo.” In Anceschi and Matatrese, 429-41.Google Scholar
Lot, Ferdinand. 1918. Etude sur le Lancelot en prose. Paris.Google Scholar
Marinelli, Peter. 1987. Ariosto and Boiardo: The Origins of “Orlando Furioso.” Columbia, MO.Google Scholar
Marsh, David. 1981. “Ruggiero and Leone: Revision and Resolution in Ariosto's Orlando furioso.” MLN96: 1, 144-51.Google Scholar
Martinez, Ronald L. 1994. “De-Cephalizing Rinaldo: The Money of Tyranny in Niccolb da Correggio's Fabula de Cefalo and in Orlando furioso 42-43.” Annali d'ltalianistica: 12 (1994) 87-114.Google Scholar
Martinez, Ronald L. 1999. “Two Odysseys: Rinaldo's Po Journey and the Poet's Homecoming in Orlando furioso.” In Finucci, 1999, 17-55.Google Scholar
Mayer, Thomas F. 1993. “Ariosto Anticlerical: Epic Poetry and the Clergy in Early Cinquecento Italy.” In Anticlericalism in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe, eds. Peter Kykema and Heiko Oberman, 283-97. Leiden and New York.Google Scholar
Micocci, Claudio. 1998. “La presenza della tradizione classica nell’ Orlando innamorato.” In Anceschi and Matarrese, 43-61.Google Scholar
Moretti, Walter. 1977. L'ultimo Ariosto. Bologna.Google Scholar
Moretti, Walter. 1984. “L'ideale ariostesco di un'Europa pacificata e unita e la sua crisis nel terzo Furioso? In The Renaissance in Ferraralll Rinascimento a Ferrara, eds. J. Salmons and W. Moretti, 233-44. Ravenna.Google Scholar
Murrin, Michael. 1994. History and Warfare in Renaissance Epic. Chicago.Google Scholar
Nohrnberg, James. 1976. The Analogy of the “Faerie Queene.” Princeton.Google Scholar
Nohrnberg, James. 1998. “Orlando's Opportunity: Chance, Luck, Fortune, Occasion, Boats and Blows in Boiardo's Orlando innamorato.” In Cavallo and Ross, 31-75.Google Scholar
Ossola, Carlo. 1976. “Dantismi metrici nel Furioso.” In Ludovico Ariosto: lingua, stile e tradizione, ed. Cesare Segre, 65- 94. Milan.Google Scholar
Pampaloni, Leonzio. 1971. “La guerra nel Furioso.” Belfagor 26: 627–52.Google Scholar
Parker, Patricia. 1979. Inescapable Romance: Studies in the Poetics of a Mode. Princeton.Google Scholar
Petrarca, Francesco. 1951. Rime, Trionfi e Poesie Latine. Eds. F. Neri, G. Martellotti, E. Bianchi, and N. Sapegno. Milan and Naples.Google Scholar
Nohrnberg, James. 1976. Petrarch's Lyric Poems. Ed. and trans. Robert M. Durling. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Pocock, J.G.A. 1975. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton.Google Scholar
Portner, I. A. 1982. “A Non-Performance of II negromante.” Italica 59: 316–29.Google Scholar
Quint, David. 1979. “The Figure of Atlante: Ariosto and Boiardo's Poem.” MLN 94: 77–91.Google Scholar
Quint, David. 1983. Origin and Originality in Renaissance Literature: Versions of the Source. New Haven.Google Scholar
Quint, David. 1996. “Introduction.” In Cinque Canti/Five Cantos, trans. A. Sheers and D. Quint, 1-44. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Quint, David. 1997. “Narrative Interlace and Narrative Genres in Don Quijote and the Orlando Furioso.” Modern Language Quarterly 58: 241–68.Google Scholar
Rajna, Pio. 1975. Lefonti dell’ Orlando furioso. First printed, 1900. 2nd edition. Florence.Google Scholar
Rambaldi, Odoardo. 1998. “Lo stato estense e Matteo Maria Boiardo.” In Anceschi and Matarrese, 549-606.Google Scholar
Ross, Charles. 1989. “Introduction.” In Boiardo, 1989, 1-29.Google Scholar
Ross, Charles. 1998. “Damsel in Distress? Origille's Subjectivity.” In Cavallo and Ross, 175-90.Google Scholar
Saccone, Eduardo. 1974. “Clorindano e Medoro, con alcuni argomenti per una lettura del primo Furioso.” In IIsoggetto del “Furioso “ e altri saggi tra Quattro e Cinquecento, 161-200. Naples.Google Scholar
Saccone, Eduardo. 1983. “Prospettive sull'ultimo Ariosto.” MLN 98: 55–69.Google Scholar
Sangirardi, Giuseppe. 1993. Boiardismo ariostesco: presenza e trattamento del- V'Orlando innamorato “ nel “Furioso.” Lucca.Google Scholar
Segre, Cesare. 1966. “Un repertorio linguistico e stilistico dell'Ariosto: La Commedia ”. In Esperienze ariostesche, 51-83. Pisa.Google Scholar
Sestan, E. 1975. “Gli Estensi e il loro stato al tempo dell'Ariosto.” Rassegna della letteratura italiana 69: 19–31.Google Scholar
Shemek, Deanna. 1998. Ladies Errant: Wayward Women and Social Order in Early Modern Italy. Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Sitterson, Joseph. 1992. “Allusive and Elusive Meanings: Reading Ariosto's Vergilian Ending.” Renaissance Quarterly 45: 1–19.Google Scholar
Stinger, Charles. 1985. The Renaissance in Rome. Bloomington.Google Scholar
Tasso, Torquato. 1993. Discourses on the Poetic Art. Translated in Lawrence Rhu. The Genesis ofTasso's Narrative Theory. Detroit.Google Scholar
Tuohy, Thomas. 1996. Herculean Ferrara: Ercole d'Este, 1471-1505, and the Invention of a Ducal Capital Cambridge.Google Scholar
Vinaver, Eugene. 1971. The Rise of Romance. Oxford.Google Scholar
Weaver, Elissa. 1977. “Lettura dell'intreccio dell’ Orlando furioso: il caso delle tre pazzie d'amore.” Strumenti critici 11: 384–406.Google Scholar
Wiggins, Peter. 1986. Figures in Ariosto's Tapestry: Character and Design in the “Orlando furioso.” Baltimore.Google Scholar
Yates, Frances. 1975. Astraea: The Imperial Theme in the Sixteenth Century. London and Boston.Google Scholar
Zatti, Sergio. 1990. Il “Furioso“tra epos e romanzo. Lucca.Google Scholar
Zatti, Sergio. 1996. L'Ombra del Tasso: epica e romanzo nel Cinquecento. Milan.Google Scholar