Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:41:23.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The meaning of mystical ‘darkness’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2005

PETER KÜGLER
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria

Abstract

Arguments by W. T. Stace and C. J. Insole show that metaphorical descriptions of God presuppose literal descriptions of God. This poses a problem for the metaphor of darkness which has often been used, for instance by Pseudo-Dionysius, in the context of negative theology and apophatic mysticism. Three strategies of dealing with the problem are discussed in this article. The negative, apophatic approach can be seen either as subverting itself, or as being restricted to certain properties, or as resting on a self-excluding principle. Whereas the first two strategies have their difficulties, self-exclusion is linguistically founded and adequate to the purposes of negative theology.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)