Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:28:09.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Irony and Argument in Dialogues, XII

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Scott Davis
Scott Davis
Affiliation:
School of Religion, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0355
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Toward the end of Hume's Dialogues concerning Natural Religion, Philo catalogues the ‘frivolous observances’, ‘rapturous ecstasies’ and ‘bigotted credulity’ of ‘vulgar superstition’, concluding that ‘true religion, I allow, has no such pernicious consequences: But we must treat of religion, as it has com monly been found in the world’ (Hume, 1947: 222–3). This would be a mild enough sort of caveat were it not nigh on impossible to determine exactly what counts as true religion, and how it figures in Hume's argument. Typically, answers to this puzzle have required identifying the positions of the discussants, and then arguing that one of them represents Hume's views. A catalogue of the options may prove instructive.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 239 - 257
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Becker, Carl. The Heavenly City of the Philosophers (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1932).Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. ‘Hume and the Sources of German Anti-Rationalism’, in Morice (1977).Google Scholar
Brody, Baruch (ed.). Readings in the Philosophy of Religion: An Analytic Approach (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1974).Google Scholar
Busch, Eberhard. Karl Barth, His Life from Letters and Autobiographical texts, transl. by Bowden, J. (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, Andrew S. (eds.). The Origins and Nature of the Scottish Enlightenment (Deinburgh: John Donald, 1982).Google Scholar
Chappell, V. C. (ed.). Hume: A Collection of Critical Essays (Garden City, New York: Doubleday Anchor Books, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Dorothy P. ‘Interpreting Hume's Dialogues’, Religious Studies XXVI (2, 06 1989).Google Scholar
Flew, Anthony. Hume's Philosophy of Belief: A Study of his First ‘Inquiry’ (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961).Google Scholar
Frei, Hans. The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskin, J. C. A.Hume's Philosophy of Religion (London: Macmillan Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. The Emergence of Probability (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Hume, David. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, ed. by Smith, Norman Kemp (Edinburgh: Thomas Nelson & Sons, 1947).Google Scholar
Hume, David. The Philosophy of David Hume, ed. by Chappell, V. C. (New York: Random House Modern Library, 1963).Google Scholar
Hume, David. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and the Posthumous Essays, ed. by Popkin, Richard (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 1980).Google Scholar
Livingstone, Donald W. & Kind, James T. (eds.). Hume: A Re-Evaluation (New York: Fordham University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Marsden, George. ‘The Collapse of American Evangelical Academia’ in Plantinga & Wolterstorif (1983).Google Scholar
Morice, G. P. (ed.). David Hume: Bicentenary Papers (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Newman, John Henry. Apologia pro Vita Sua, ed. by DeLaura, D. (New York: Norton Books, 1968).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. Newton's Philosophy of Nature: Selections from his Writings, ed. by Thayer, H. S. (New York: Hafner Publishing Co., 1953).Google Scholar
Newton-De Molina, David. (ed.). On Literary Intention (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Noxon, James. ‘Hume's Agnosticism’, Philosophical Review, LXXIII (reprinted in Chappell, 1966).Google Scholar
Alvin, Plantinga. ‘Reason and Belief in God’, in Plantinga and Wolterstorff (1983).Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. and Wolterstorff, Nicholas (eds.). Faith and Rationality (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus. Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales, vol. 3, transl. by Gummere, R. M. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1925).Google Scholar
Shepherd, Christine M. ‘Newtonianism in the Scottish Universities in the Seventeenth Century’, in Campbell & Skinner (1982).Google Scholar
Stout, Jeffrey. The Flight from Authority (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Sutherland, Stewart R. ‘The Presbyterian Inheritance of Hume and Reid’, in Campbell & Skinner (1982).Google Scholar
Nicholas, Wolterstorff. ‘Can Belief in God be Rational if it has No Foundations?’, in Plantinga & Wolterstorff (1983).Google Scholar
Keith, Yandell. ‘Hume on Religious Belief’, in Livingstone & King (1976).Google Scholar