Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:53:04.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon Concentration in the Atmosphere: 8000-Year Record of Variations in Tree Rings: First Results of a USA Workshop

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Jeffrey Klein ,
Juan Carlos Lerman ,
Paul E Damon  and
Timothy Linick
Jeffrey Klein
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Radiocarbon Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Juan Carlos Lerman
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
Paul E Damon
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
Timothy Linick
Affiliation:
Mt Soledad Radiocarbon Laboratory, University of California, San Diego, California 92037
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Radiocarbon dates calculated from the ratio of modern carbon-14 activity and sample activity and the half-life of carbon-14 need to be calibrated to compensate for temporal variations in the concentration of carbon-14 in the atmosphere. Development of a suitable calibration scheme has been an ongoing process of the last twenty years, ever since the discovery of variations in historical times of the atmospheric radiocarbon content which parallel climatic and solar phenomena (de Vries, 1958; 1959) and the recent depletion due to industrial effects (Suess, 1955).

Type
Calibration and Data Reporting
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 22 , Issue 3: Heidelberg , 1980 , pp. 950 - 961
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science

References

Clark, R M, 1973, Tree-ring calibration of radiocarbon dates and the chronology of ancient Egypt: Nature, v 243, p 266–270.Google Scholar
Clark, R M 1975, A calibration curve for radiocarbon dates: Antiquity, v 49, p 251–266.Google Scholar
Clark, R M 1979, Calibration, cross-validation and carbon-14: Royal Statistical Soc Jour, v 142, no. Al, p 47–62.Google Scholar
Clark, R M and Renfrew, Colin, 1972, A statistical approach to the calibration of floating tree-ring chronologies using radiocarbon dates: Archaeometry, v 14, p 5–19.Google Scholar
Currie, L A, 1972, The evaluation of radiocarbon measurements and inherent statistical limitations in age resolution, in Rafter, T A and Grant-Taylor, T, eds, Internatl radiocarbon dating conf, 8th, Proc: Wellington, Royal Soc New Zealand, p H1-H15.Google Scholar
Damon, P E, 1970, Climatic versus magnetic perturbation of the atmospheric C14 reservoir, in Olsson, I U, ed, Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology, Nobel symposium, 12th, Proc: New York, John Wiley & Sons, p 571–593.Google Scholar
Damon, P E, Lerman, J C, Long, Austin, Bannister, B, Klein, Jeffrey and Linick, T W, 1980, Report on the workshop on the calibration of the radiocarbon dating time scale, in Stuiver, Minze and Kra, Renee, eds, Internatl radiocarbon conf, 10th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 22, no. 3, p 947–949.Google Scholar
Damon, P E, Long, Austin, and Ferguson, W C, 1974, Dendrochronologic calibration of the radiocarbon time scale: Am Antiquity, v 39, p 350–366.Google Scholar
Damon, P E, Long, Austin, and Wallick, E I, 1972, Dendrochonologic calibration of the carbon-14 time scale, in Rafter, T A and Grant-Taylor, T, eds, Internatl radiocarbon dating conf, 8th, Proc: Wellington, Royal Soc New Zealand, p A28-A43.Google Scholar
de Jong, A F M, Mook, W G, and Becker, Bernd, 1979, Confirmation of Suess wiggles: 3200-3700 bc: Nature, v 280, p 48–49.Google Scholar
Lerman, J C, Mook, W G, and Vogel, J C, 1970, C-14 in tree rings from different localities, in Olsson, I U, ed, Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology, Nobel symposium, 12th, Proc: New York, John Wiley & Sons, p 275–301.Google Scholar
McKerrell, H, 1975, Correction procedures for C-14 dates, in Watkins, T, eds, Radiocarbon: Calibration and prehistory: Edinburgh, Edinburgh Univ Press, p 47–100.Google Scholar
Michael, H N and Klein, Jeffrey, 1979, An international calibration for radiocarbon dates: MASCA Jour, v i, no. 2, p 56–57.Google Scholar
Michael, H N and Ralph, E K, 1972, Discussion of radiocarbon dates obtained from precisely dated Sequoia and Bristlecone Pine samples, in Rafter, T A and Grant-Taylor, T, eds, Internatl radiocarbon dating conf, 8th, Proc: Wellington, Royal Soc New Zealand, p 28–43.Google Scholar
Mosteller, F and Tukey, J W, 1977, Data analysis and regression: a second course in statistics: Reading, Mass, Addison-Wesley, 588 p.Google Scholar
Olsson, I, ed, 1970, Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology, Nobel symposium, 12th, Proc: New York, John Wiley & Sons, 657 p.Google Scholar
Ralph, E K and Klein, Jeffrey, 1979, Composite computer plots of 14C-dates for tree-ring dated bristlecone pine and Sequoia, in Berger, Rainer and Suess, H E, eds, Radiocarbon dating, Internatl radiocarbon conf, 9th, Proc: Berkeley/Los Angeles, Univ California Press, p 545–553.Google Scholar
Ralph, E K and Michael, H N, 1970, MASCA radiocarbon dates for Sequoia and bristlecone-pine samples, in Olsson, I U, ed, Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology, Nobel symposium, 12th, Proc: New York, John Wiley & Sons, p 619–624.Google Scholar
Ralph, E K, Michael, H N, and Flan, M C, 1973, Radiocarbon dates and reality: MASCA Newsletter, v 9, p 1–20.Google Scholar
Stuiver, Minze and Quay, Paul D, 1980, Changes in atmospheric 14C attributed to a variable sun: Science, v 207, p 11–19.Google Scholar
Stuiver, Minze and Suess, H E, 1966, On the relationship between radiocarbon dates and true ages: Radiocarbon, v 8, p 534–540.Google Scholar
Suess, H E, 1955, Radiocarbon concentration in modern wood: Science, v 122, p 415–417.Google Scholar
Suess, H E 1967, Bristlecone pine calibration of the radiocarbon time scale from 4100 bc to 1500 bc, in Radioactive dating and methods of low-level counting: Vienna, IAEA, p 143–151.Google Scholar
Suess, H E 1970, Bristlecone pine calibration of the radiocarbon time scale 5200 bc to the present, in Olsson, I U, ed, Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology, Nobel symposium, 12th, Proc: New York, John Wiley & Sons, p 303–311.Google Scholar
Switsur, V R, 1973, The radiocarbon calendar recalibrated: Antiquity, v 47, p 131–137.Google Scholar
Tukey, J W, 1977, Exploratory data analysis: Reading, Mass, Addison-Wesley, 688 p.Google Scholar
Velleman, P F, 1977, Robust nonlinear data smoothers: Definitions and recommendations: Natl Acad Sci, USA, Proc, v 74, no. 2, p 434–436.Google Scholar
de Vries, Hessel, 1958, Variation in concentration of radiocarbon with time and location on earth: Koninkl Nederlandse Wetensch Proc, ser B, v 61, p 94–102.Google Scholar
de Vries, Hessel 1959, Measurement and use of natural radiocarbon, in Abelson, P H, ed, Researches in Geochemistry: New York, John Wiley & Sons, p 169–189.Google Scholar
Wendland, W M, and Donley, D L, 1971, Radiocarbon-calendar age relationship: Earth Planetary Sci Letters, v 2, p 135–139.Google Scholar