Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:15:51.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The AMS Dating of Separate Fractions in Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

R J Batten ,
Richard Gillespie ,
J A J Gowlett  and
Rem Hedges
R J Batten
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art Oxford University, 6 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3QJ, England
Richard Gillespie
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art Oxford University, 6 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3QJ, England
J A J Gowlett
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art Oxford University, 6 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3QJ, England
Rem Hedges
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art Oxford University, 6 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3QJ, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The usefulness of radiocarbon dates in archaeology greatly depends on both the stratigraphic relationship of the sample submitted and on the origin and homogeneity of the measured carbon. For very small samples, stratigraphic relationships can raise additional problems of movement. In chemically well-characterized materials, the best example being collagen, the carbon source can be reasonably well purified. Many samples, however, survive as a complex mixture of high molecular weight polyphenolic materials, with properties between charcoals, humic acids, and lignins. Charred bone, eg, which rarely contains useful quantities of amino acids, and charred seeds, as well as ‘charcoal,’ frequently come into this category. For such samples, the likelihood of contamination by percolating soil humics is high. It is often possible to extract chemically different fractions and to compare the dates obtained. A less exact comparison can also be made for different samples from the same context. The results suggest that ‘humic’ acid dates can be reliable in a surprisingly frequent number of situations, and that where direct comparison is possible, the reliability can be individually assessed.

Type
VII. Applications in Archaeology
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 28 , Issue 2A , 1986 , pp. 698 - 701
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Gillespie, R, Gowlett, J A J and Hedges, R E M, 1984, Recent developments in archaeology using an accelerator: Nuclear Instruments & Methods, v 233, no. 2, p 308–331.Google Scholar
Huyge, D and Vermeersch, P M, 1982, Late Mesolithic settlement at Weelde-Paardsdrank: Studia Praehist Belgica, v 1, p 117–209.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A and Brézillon, M, 1972, Fouilles de Pincevent. Essai d'analyse ethnographique d'un habitat magdalénien (La section 36): Supp 7, Gallia Préhistoire.Google Scholar
Moore, A M T, 1975, The excavations of Tell Abu Hureyra in Syria: A preliminary report: Proc Prehist Soc, v 41, p 50–77.Google Scholar
Noy, T, Legge, A J and Higgs, E S, 1973, Recent excavations at Nahal Oren, Israel: Proc Prehist Soc, v 39, p 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar