Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:50:20.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modification of specular reflexion and light transmission by biological surface structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2009

C. G. Bernhard ,
G. Gemne  and
A. R. Møller
C. G. Bernhard
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology II, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
G. Gemne
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology II, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
A. R. Møller
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology II, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Biophysicists, who, by definition, apply physical and mathematical principles to their analysis of biological problems for the understanding of the functions of living organisms, are to a great extent concerned with basic characteristics more or less common to all organisms. As pointed out by Griffin (1958) in his book on acoustic orientation, it may well be that ‘this fruitful preoccupation with the universals of protoplasm tends to foster an unduly restricted view of its many intricate potentialities’. The knowledge of the many ways in which animals and plants are adapted for a ‘successful life’ has had a great impact upon the concepts of evolution and natural selection. As a contribution to the proper understanding of these concepts the study of the biophysical principles, by which various geometrically oriented tissues serve different functions, becomes of special interest.

Type
Research Article
Information
Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , May 1968 , pp. 89 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bernhard, C. G. (1967). Structural and functional adaptation in a visual system. Endeavour 26, 79–84.Google Scholar
Bernhard, C. G., Gemne, G. & Møller, A. R. (1968). In course of publication.Google Scholar
Bernhard, C. G. & Miller, W. H. (1962). A corneal nipple pattern in insect compound eyes. Acta physiol. scand. 56, 385–6.Google Scholar
Bernhard, C. G., Miller, W. H. & Møller, A. R. (1963). Function of the corneal nipples in the compound eyes of insects. Acta physiol. scand. 58, 381–2.Google Scholar
Bernhard, C. G., Miller, W. H. & Møller, A. R. (1965). The insect corneal nipple array. Acta physiol. scand. 63, Suppl. 243, 1–79.Google Scholar
Cott, H. B. (1957). Adaptive Coloration in Animals. London: Methuen and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Denton, E. J. & Nicol, J. A. C. (1962). Why fishes have silvery sides; and a method of measuring reflectivity. J. Physiol. 165, 13–15.Google Scholar
Denton, E. J. & Nicol, J. A. C. (1964). On the orientation of reflecting crystals in the surfaces of fishes. J. Physiol. 172, 53–4.Google Scholar
Denton, E. J. & Nicol, J. A. C. (1965 a). Studies on reflexion of light from silvery surfaces of fishes, with special reference to the bleak, Alburnus albernus. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 45, 683–703.Google Scholar
Denton, E. J. & Nicol, J. A. C. (1965 b). Reflexion of light by external surfaces of the herring, Clupea harengus. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 45, 711–38.Google Scholar
Denton, E. J. & Nicol, J. A. C. (1966). A survey of reflectivity in silvery teleosts. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 46, 685–722.Google Scholar
Exner, F. & Exner, S. (1910). Die physikalischen Grundlagen der Blütenfärbungen. S.-B. Akad. Wiss., Wien. Math.-nat. Kl. Abt. 1, 119, 191–246.Google Scholar
Gemne, G. (1966 a).Ultrastructural ontogenesis of cornea and corneal nipples in the compound eye of insects. Acta physiol. scand. 66, 511–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gemne, G. (1966 b).Fine structure of the insect cornea and corneal nipples during ontogenesis. In: Electron Microscopy 1966. Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress for Electron Microscopy, Kyoto, vol. 11, pp. 511–12.Google Scholar
Gemne, G. (1966). In preparation.Google Scholar
Gemne, G. (1966). Listening in the Dark. The Acoustic Orientation of Bats and Men. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jerlov, N. G. & Fukuda, A. (1960). Radiance distribution in the upper layers of the sea. Tellus 12, 348–55.Google Scholar
Miller, V. H., Bernard, G. D. & Allen, J. L. (1967). Reflection properties of arthropod corneas. J. opt. Soc. Am. 51, 516.Google Scholar
Miller, W. H., Møller, A. R. & Bernhard, C. G. (1966). The corneal nipple array. In: The Functional Organization of the Compound Eye, pp. 21–33. Ed. Bernhard, C. G.. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Poulton, E. B. (1888). Notes in 1887 upon Lepidopterous Larvae, etc., including a complete account of the life-history of the larvae of Sphinx convolvuli and Agliatau. Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond. pp. 515–606, 3 p1s.Google Scholar
Thayer, G. H. (1909). Concealing-Coloration in the Animal Kingdom. An Exposition of the Laws of Disguise through Color and Pattern, pp. xix+ 260, 16 pls., 140 figs. New York:Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tyler, J. E. (1960). Radiance distribution as a function of depth in an underwater environment. Bull. Scripps Instn biol. Res. 7, 363–412.Google Scholar