Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T09:34:06.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Method of Scalogram Analysis Using Summary Statistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Bert F. Green
Bert F. Green*
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A method of Guttman scalogram analysis is presented that does not involve sorting and rearranging the entries in the item response matrix. The method requires dichotomous items. Formulas are presented for estimating the reproducibility of the scale and estimating the expected value of the chance reproducibility. An index of consistency is suggested for evaluating the reproducibility. An illustrative example is presented in detail. The logical basis of the method is discussed. Finally, several methods are suggested for dealing with non-dichotomous items.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , March 1956 , pp. 79 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © 1956 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Lois K. Anderson assisted the author materially in the many computations required for this paper. The research reported in this paper was supported in part by the Department of Economics and Social Sciences at M.I.T. and in part, jointly, by the Army, Navy and Air Force under contract with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

References

Festinger, L. The treatment of qualitative data by “scale analysis.”. Psychol. Bull., 1947, 44, 146–161CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, R. N. A rapid scoring procedure for scaling attitude questions. Publ. Opin. Quart., 1950, 14, 507–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. The Cornell technique for scale and intensity analysis. Educ. psychol. Measmt., 1947, 7, 247–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. et al. The basis for scalogram analysis. In Stouffer, S. A. et al (Eds.), Measurement and prediction (pp. 60–90). Princeton, N. J.: Princeton Univ. Press, 1950Google Scholar
Jackson, J. M. A simple and more rigorous technique for scale analysis. A manual of scale analysis, Part II, Montreal: McGill Univ., 1949Google Scholar
Kahn, L. H. and Bodine, A. J.. Guttman scale analysis by means of IBM equipment. Educ. psychol. Measmt., 1951, 11, 298–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loevinger, Jane A systematic approach to the construction and evaluation of tests of ability. Psychol. Monogr., 1947, 61, No. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marder, E. Linear segments: a technique for scalogram analysis. Publ. Opin. Quart., 1952, 16, 417–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzel, H. A new coefficient for scalogram analysis. Publ. Opin. Quart., 1953, 17, 268–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noland, E. W. Worker attitude and industrial absenteeism: a statistical appraisal. Amer. sociol. Rev., 1945, 10, 503–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouffer, S. A., Borgatta, E. F., Hays, D. G., and Henry, A. F.. A technique for improving cumulative scales. Publ. Opin. Quart., 1952, 16, 273–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, E. A. et al. The scalogram board technique for scale analysis. In Stouffer, S. A. et al (Eds.), Measurement and prediction (pp. 91–121). Princeton, N. J.: Princeton Univ. Press, 1950Google Scholar
Suchman, E. A. et al. The utility of scalogram analysis. In Stouffer, S. A. et al (Eds.), Measurement and prediction (pp. 122–171). Princeton, N. J.: Princeton Univ. Press, 1950Google Scholar