Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:59:49.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A behavioral typology of hypertensive out-patients followed up in general practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2020

M.E. Safar
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and the Hypertension Research Center, Diagnosis Center, Broussais Hospital, Paris, France
Get access

Summary

2275 hypertensive patients consulting their usual general practitioner were analyzed using a specifically designed questionnaire. Sixty-two percent of the subjects were already treated and 38% were untreated prior to inclusion in the study. The data, collected during the usual medical consultation, included several questions answered by the physician concerning the patient's psychological status as well as a series of behavioural scales. The aim of this study was to describe a small number of different and homogeneous psychological patterns rather than a unique profile of hypertensive out-patients. Four types were thus defined using a statistical clustering procedure and were designated as ‘everything is OK”, “hyper-reactive”, “depressed”, and “dynamic-competitive”, representing respectively 43%, 33%, 10% and 14% of the population studied. The first type consists of patients who do not express subjective complaints and claim to have no conflicts, but who have difficulty adjusting to environmental changes. The second type is characterized by emotionally unstable individuals who are easily overwhelmed by their difficulties. The third type corresponds to pessimistic subjects, still affected by previous painful life events. Finally, the fourth type, close to coronary-prone type A behaviour, is composed of subjects whose aggression is channelled into social competition. The distribution of hypertensives amongst these 4 types is the same whether previously treated or not. Under treatment throughout the 6 months’ follow-up, the evolution of mean systolic blood pressure (SUP) and of mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was similar in the 4 types, although the second type showed the highest SBP during this period. Second and third type subjects more frequently reported the classical symptoms of hypertension. First and third type subjects reported more side-effects with antihypertensive treatment. Each type's vulnerability to stress is discussed from a psychosomatic viewpoint of essential hypertension. This study provides evidence that several behavioural patterns can be described amongst hypertensive patients. Knowledge of these patterns may be very useful in clinical practice to manage the Patient-physician relationship, and to increase patient compliance with antihypertensive therapy.

Résumé

Résumé

2275 dossiers d'hypertendus suivis par leur médecin généraliste ont été analysés à l'aide d'un questionnaire élaboré à cet effet. 62% des sujets avaient déjà éié traités avant leur inclusion dans l'étude et 38% ne l'avaient jamais été. Les données recueillies au cours des consultations médicales habituelles comprenaient plusieurs questions, auxquelles devaient répondre les généralistes, sur l'équilibre psychologique des patients ainsi qu ’une série d'échelles comportementales. Le but de cette étude était de décrire un petit nombre de profils psychologiques, homogènes et différents les uns des autres, plutôt qu ’un profit unique, chez des hypertendus suivis en ambulatoire. Quatre « types » ont pu être ainsi définis grâce à une procédure de typologie canonique, et ont été désignés par les termes: «tout-va-bien», «hyper-réactif», «dépressif» et «dynamique-adapté», représentant respectivement 43%, 33%, 10% et 14% de la population étudiée. Le premier type est constitué par des patients qui n’expriment pas de plaintes subjectives et disent ne pas avoir de conflits mais paraissent peu adaplables aux changements de situation. Le deuxièine type est caractérisé par des individus instables émotionnellement et facilement débordés par leurs difficultés. Le troisième type correspond à des sujets pessimistes, marqués par des événemenis vitaux éprouvants. Enfin le qualrième type, proche du «type A» coronarogène, est composé de sujets dont l'agressivité est canalisée dans la compétition sociale. La répartition entre ces quatre types est la même pour des hypertendus déjà traités ou jamais traités. L'évolution de la presssion artérielle systolique moyenne (PAS) et de la pression artérielle diastolique moyenne est comparable dans les quatre types tout au long des six mois de suivi, bien que le second type présente la PAS la plus élevée pendant toute cette période. Les patients appartenant au second ou au troisième type rapportent plus fréquemment les signes fonctionnels classiques de l'hypertension artérielle. Une plus grande fréquence d'effets secondaires du traitement anti-hypertenseur sont relevés au sein du premier et du troisième type. La vulnérabilité psychologique de chacun de ces types face au stress est discutée dans une perspective psychosomatique de l’hypertension artérielle. Cette étude démontre que l’on pent décrire plusieurs profils comportementaux chez des patients hypertendus: leur connaissance peut s'avérer d'une grande utilité en médecine praticienne pour le maniement de la relation médecin-malade et pour améliorer l'observance d'un traitement anti-hypertenseur.

Type
Original article
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, F. (1939) Psychoanalytic study of a case of essential hypertension. Psychosom. Med. 1, 139152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breckenridge, A. (1983) Compliance of hypertensive patients with pharmacological treatment. Hypertension 5, suppl. 3, 8589Google Scholar
Bulpitt, C.J. & Dollery, C.T. (1973) Side effects of hypotensive agents evaluated by a self-administered questionnaire. Br. Med. J. 3, 485490CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, M.H. (1971) Is high blood pressure a Psychosomatic disorder? (a critical review of the evidence). J. Chron. Dis. 2, 239258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, F. (1954) Emotions and Bodily Changes. Columbia Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
Esler, M.Julius, S.Zweifler, A.Randall, O.Harburg, E.Gardiner, H. & Dc Quattro, V. (1977) Mild highrenin essential hypertension (neurogenic human hypertension?) N. Engl. J. Med. 296, 405411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handkins, R.E. & Munz, D.C. (1978) Essential hypertension and self disclosure. J. Clin. Psychol. 34, 8708753.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Insel, P.M.Fraser, G. E.Phillips, R. & Williams, P. (1981) Psychosocial factors and blood pressure in children. J. Psychosom. Res. 25, 505511CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jern, S. (1982) Psychological and hemodynamic factors in borderline hypertension. Acta. Med. Scand. 662 r (suppl.) 155Google ScholarPubMed
Kruskal, J.B. (1977) The relationship between multidimensional scaling and clustering. In: Classifications and Clustering (Van Ryzin J., ed.), Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Linden, W. & Feuerstein, M. (1981) Essential hypertension and social coping behaviour. J. Hainan Stress 7, 2834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund-Johansen, P. (1976) Haemodynamic long term effects of a new beta-adrenoceptor blocking drug, atenolol (1C1 66082) in essential hypertension. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 3, 445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mac Clelland, D.C. (1978) Inhibited power motivation and high blood pressure in men. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 8, 182190Google Scholar
Marty, P. & M'Uzan, M. de (1963) La pensée opératoire. Rev. Fr. Psychanal. 27 (suppl), 345356Google Scholar
M., M'Uzan de & Bonfils, S. (1961) Analyse et classification des aspects psychosomatiques de l'ulcère gastroduodénal en milieu hospitalier. Rev. Fr. Etud. Clin. Biol. 6, 4658Google Scholar
Perini, CAmann, F. W.Bolli, P. & Buhler, F.R. (1982) Personality and adrenergic factors in essential hypertension. Contrib. Nephrol. 30, 6469CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, J.O. (1964) A possible effect of selection on the test scores of a group of hypertensives. J. Psychosom. Res. 8, 239243CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenman, R.H.Brand, R. J., Jenkins CD., Friedman, M.Strauss, R. & Wurm, M. (1975) Coronary heart disease in the Western Collaborative Group Study: final follow-up experience of 8 1/2 years. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 233, 872877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safar, M., Kamicniecka FL, Levenson, J.Dimitriu, V. & Pauleau, N. (1978) Hemodynamic factors and Rorschach testing in borderline and sustained hypertension. Psychosom. Med. 40, 620630CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saul, E. (1939) Psychosomatic disorders in essential hypertension. Psychosom. Med. 1, 153161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, A.P. (1961) An experimental study of comparative responses of blood pressure to different noxious stimuli. J. Chron. Dis. 13, 293311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sifncos, P.E. (1973) The prevalence of “alexithymic“ characteristics in psychosomatic patients. Psychother. Psychosom. 22, 255262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, P.Schoentgen, S., De Quattro, V.Procci, W.Levine, D., Van del Meulen, J. & Boinheimcr, J. (1981) Anxiety, anger, and neurogenic tone at rest and in stress in patients with primary hypertension. Hypertension 3 (suppl. 2), II-l 19-11123CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Egeren, L.F.Abelson, J.L. & Thornton, D.W. (1978) Cardiovascular consequences of expressing anger in a mutually dependent relationship, J. Psychosom. Res. 22, 537548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, E.H. & Strogatz, D.S. (1984) Hypertension labeling and well-being: alternative explanations in crosssectional data. J. Chronic. Dis., 37, 943947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.