Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T20:14:37.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grounding Probabilities from Below

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Ian Hacking
Ian Hacking*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

What is at issue between the propensity and the long run frequency schools of thought about objective probability? Recent debate, although vigorous, has contributed little to our understanding of natural law or statistical inference. Yet there is at least one real question, none other than the much maligned topic of emergentism. Although this invokes a number of metaphysical views, such as the unity of science, emergentism primarily poses a question of matter of fact. Is it the case that every stable frequency, correctly represented by a mathematical probability, is ‘grounded from below’ by probabilities that apply to individuals? That is, does the frequency distribution in the population derive from probabalistic facts about the individuals that compose it? Or are there some stable frequencies that pertain to populations, but do not derive from probabalistic facts about members of the population?

At least two approaches to these questions have been developed.

Type
Part IV. Statistics, Probability and Likelihood
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1980 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1980 , 1980 , pp. 110 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Research supported by National Science Foundation Grant SOC 7906928

References

Bernoulli, Jacques (1713). Ars Conjectandi. Basel: Thurnisiorum.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1895). Le Suicide Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1980). “La Statistique du Suicide au XIXe Siècle.” L'Approache Probabaliste en Mėdecine. Edited by Fagot, A. Paris: Flammarion. In Press.Google Scholar
Heyde, C.C. and Seneta, E. (1977). I.J. Bienaymé, Statistical Theory Anticipated Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knodel, John E. (1972). The Decline of Fertility in Germany, 1871-1939. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lexis, W. (1877). Zur Theorie der Massenerscheinungen in der Menschlichen Gesellschaft. Freiburg: Wagner.Google Scholar
Poisson, S.D. (1835). Recherches Sur la Probabilite des Jugements Principalement en Matiere Criminelle. Comptes Rendu Hebdomaires des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences, I. Pages 473–494. Also Note Sur la Loi des Grands Nombres, Ibid, II, 1836. Pages 377–382.Google Scholar
Spurzheim, J.G. (1815). The Physiognomical System of Drs. Gall and Spurzheim London: Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy.Google Scholar
Todd, Emmanuel (1979). Le Fou et le Prolétaire Paris: Laffont.Google Scholar