Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:06:27.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oil, Revolution, and International Conflict: A Toxic Mix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2009

Jeff Colgan
Affiliation:
Princeton University

Extract

What is the relationship between oil and international conflict? In an era of increased dependence on, and greater volatility within, global markets for oil and energy, this question is central to understanding contemporary world politics. It is an empirical fact that petrostates—defined as states that have at least 10% of GDP derived from oil exports—are more prone to international conflict than non-petrostates. Indeed, in the period 1965–2001, petrostates engaged in militarized interstate disputes at roughly twice the rate of non-petrostates, on average. What explains this propensity?

Type
Association News
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Collier, P., and Hoeffler, A.. 2000. Greed and Grievance in Civil War. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, Development Research Group.Google Scholar
Fearon, J., and Laitin, D.. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review 97 (1): 7590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klare, Michael T. 2004. Blood and Oil: The Dangers and Consequences of America's Growing Dependency on Imported Petroleum. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Klare, Michael T. 2001. Resource Wars: The New Landscape of Global Conflict. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Victor, David G. 2007. “What Resource Wars?” The National Interest, November 12.Google Scholar
Westing, A. H. 1986. Global Resources and International Conflict: Environmental Factors in Strategic Policy and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar