Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T16:11:54.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Misconceptions and Realities of the 2011 Tunisian Election

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2013

Moez Hababou  and
Nawel Amrouche
Moez Hababou
Affiliation:
United Bank of Switzerland, New York
Nawel Amrouche
Affiliation:
Long Island University, New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In response to the 2011 Tunisian elections and the uncertainty surrounding Tunisia's future, we offer an empirical explanation of the election's results using socioeconomic and demographic variables. We aggregate many political analyses to describe the main parties and give insights into their strengths and weaknesses. We also examine common misconceptions advanced during the elections. Finally, we include a proposed electoral map that could be used by politicians to plan their future political strategies.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , October 2013 , pp. 741 - 747
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ajmi, Sana. 2011. “People's Petition for Freedom, Justice and Development.” http://www.tunisia-live.net.Google Scholar
Alexander, Christopher. 2010. Tunisia: Stability and Reform in the Modern Maghreb. London and New York: Routledge—Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Tayeb, Aisha. 2012. “A Reading into the Meaning and Significance of Tunisia's Election Results.” Arab Center for Research & Policy Studies. Doha case analysis. February 2012. Google Scholar
Belkaid, Akram. 2011. “Tunisie: Les Enseignements du Scrutin.” http://www.slateafrique.com/61395/tunisie-enseignements-du-scrutin-Ennahda.Google Scholar
Chrisafis, Angelique. 2011. “Tunisian Elections: The Key Parties.” http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/19/tunisia-elections-the-key-parties.Google Scholar
Coleman, Isobel. 2011. “Tunisia's Upcoming Elections: Part II.” http://www.isobelcoleman.com/2011/10/21/tunisias-upcoming-elections-part-ii/.Google Scholar
Farid, Sonia. 2011. “Moncef Marzouki Declares Presidential Candidacy.” Al Arabiya News. Google Scholar
Heneghan, Tom. 2011. “Analysis: Ennahda's Reformist Tunisian Islamism Has Strong Roots.” http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/11/07/uk-tunisia-islamism-reform-idUKTRE7A64BI20111107.Google Scholar
Hopmann, P. Terrence, and Zartman, William I.. 2012. “Tunisia: Understanding Conflict 2012.” Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University, SAIS. Google Scholar
Kefi, Ridha. 2011. “Tunisie: Les Premieres Lecons d'un Scrutin Historique.” http://www.kapitalis.com/politique/national/6494-tunisie-les-premieres-lecons-dun-scrutin-historique.html.Google Scholar
Lewis, Aidan. 2011. “Profile: Tunisia's Ennahda Party.” http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-15442859.Google Scholar
McCurdy, Daphne. 2011. “A Guide to the Tunisian Elections 2011.” Project on Middle East Democracy. Google Scholar
Sayah, M. Habib. 2013. “What the New Destourian Front Means for Tunisia.” http://fikraforum.org/?p=3254.Google Scholar
Sta Ali, H. 2011. “Tunisian Workers Communist Party.” http://www.tunisia-live.net/2011/09/26/party-profile-tunisian-workers-communist-party-parti-communiste-des-ouvriers-de-tunisie.Google Scholar
Teyeb, Mourad. 2011. “What Role for the Islamists?” Al-Ahram Weekly. January 27, 2011. Google Scholar
Wright, Robin. 2001. Sacred Rage, The Wrath of Militant Islam. New York: Simon and Schuster Inc. Google Scholar
Zelin, Aaron Y. 2011. “The Arab Spring's First Real Test of Democracy Arrives in Tunisia.” http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/136605/aaron-y-zelin/the-arab-springs-first-real-test-of-democracy-arrives-in-tunisia.Google Scholar