Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:37:10.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The California Plan: A 21st Century Method for Nominating Presidential Candidates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2004

Thomas Gangale
Thomas Gangale
Affiliation:
OPS-Alaska and San Francisco State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , January 2004 , pp. 81 - 87
Copyright
© 2004 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appleman Eric M. 2000 “The Rest of the Primaries” http://www.gwu.edu/~action/chrnothp.html (December 24, 2002).Google Scholar
Brock William E. 2000 “Nominating Future Presidents: Report of the Advisory Commission on the Presidential Nominating Process” http://www.rnc.org/media/pdfs/brockreport.pdf (February 13, 2003).Google Scholar
Center for Governmental Studies 2001 “Report of the National Symposium on Presidential Selection” http://www.centerforpolitics.org/reform/nssreport_entire.pdf (February 1, 2003).Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1960 “How Delegates to National Conventions are Chosen” February 12, 225.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1960b “Sixteen Presidential Primaries Scheduled for 1960” March 4, 348Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1968a “Democratic Presidential Primaries” June 14, 1480.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1968b “Republican Presidential Primaries” June 14, 1481.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1968c “GOP Delegates: One-Fifth '64 Returnees, Few Negroes” July 26, 1978– 2000Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1968d “Republican Presidential Primaries” August 16, 2147.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1968e “Credential Challenges Set Record at Convention” August 23, 2245– 2254Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1976a “Carter Coasts to Nomination in 30 Primaries” July 10, 1806– 1807Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1976b “Caucuses: Light Turnout, Many Uncommitted” July 10, 1809– 1811Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1976c “A Quick ‘Who's Who’ of GOP Delegations” August 14, 2188– 2196Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1988a “Opening Round Primaries and Caucuses … Fragmented Electorate” March 5, 570– 571Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1988b “Presidential Primary/Caucus Calendar” March 5, 574Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1988c “1988 Democratic Primary Results.” July 9, 1894.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1988d “1988 Democratic First-Round Caucus Results.” July 9, 1895.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1988e “1988 Republican Primary Results.” July 9, 1896.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1988f “1988 Republican First-Round Caucus Results.” July 9, 1897.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1992a “Primary Turnout.” March 28, 823.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1992b “Clinton Left Behind in Caucuses.” Apr. 4, 899.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1992c “Remaining Primaries, Caucuses.” Apr 11, 967.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1992d “Remaining Primaries, Caucuses.” May 2, 1188.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1996 “1996 Presidential Primary… and Caucus Calendar.” January 13, 98– 99.Google Scholar
Gorton Slade, and Joseph Lieberman. 1999 “Regional Presidential Selection Act of 1. 1999.” http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c106:s.1789: (April 8, 2003).Google Scholar
Gorton Slade. 2000 “Testimony of Senator Slade Gorton (WA) Before the Committee on Rules and Administration, United States Senate, March 29, 2000.” http://rules.senate.gov/hearings/2000/032900gorton.htm (January 25, 2003).Google Scholar
Hirsch J. M. 2000 “Smith Releases Plan to Keep New Hampshire's Primary First.” July 6. http://smith.senate.gov/Releases/Releases/07062000.HTM (January 4, 2003).Google Scholar
Klett Rooney Lieber, & Schorling. 2003 “Richard A. Forsten. Biography.” http://www.klettrooney.com/attorneys/alpha/f/forstenra.html (February 13 2003).Google Scholar
Lester Will. 2000 “GOP Abandons Plan to Overhaul Primary Schedule.” Associated Press, July 28. http://archive.nandotimes.com/election2000/story/0,3977,500233467-500339806-501946106-0-nandotimes,00.html (January 4, 2003).Google Scholar
Levin Sander. 2000 “Interregional Presidential Primary and Caucus Act of 2000.” http://thomas.loc.gov/cgibin/query/z?c106:h.r.4014: (April 8, 2003).Google Scholar
Lieberman Joseph. 1999 “Gorton, Lieberman Call for Presidential Selection Overhaul.” Press release, October 26. http://www.senate.gov/member/ct/lieberman/general/r102699a.html (January 4, 2003).Google Scholar
Lieberman Joseph. 2000 “Testimony on Regional Presidential Selection Act of 1999.” http://www.senate.gov/member/ct/lieberman/general/r032900a.html (January 25, 2003).Google Scholar
National Association of Secretaries of State. 1999 “Model Presidential Primary Legislation.” http://www.gwu.edu/~action/nass.html (April 28, 2003).Google Scholar
National Association of Secretaries of State. 2000 “Presidential Primary Plan.” http://www.nass.org/issues.html (December 23, 2002).Google Scholar
Parshall Lisa K., and Franco Mattei. 2002 “Parties and the Presidential Nomination Process: Political and Constitutional Implications of ‘Front-Loading.’” Presented at the 2002 Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, Georgia.Google Scholar
Smith Robert. 2000 “Senator Bob Smith's ‘Fairness in Primaries’ Plan.” http://www.gwu.edu/~action/smithplan.htm (February 1, 2003).Google Scholar
Patterson Thomas E. 2000 “Public Involvement and the 2000 Nominating Campaign: Implications for Electoral Reform.” The Vanishing Voter Project, April 27. http://www.vanishingvoter.org/releases/04-27-00prim-4.shtml (February 1, 2003).Google Scholar
Washington Post. 1999 “Regional Primary Plan Approved.” February 13. http://wwwwp7.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/campaigns/wh2000/stories/primary021399.htm (April 1, 1999).Google Scholar
Walsh Susan. 2000 “Primary Reform Clears GOP Hurdle.” CBSNews.com, 26 July. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2000/07/27/politics/main219401.shtml (February 13, 2003).Google Scholar