Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:33:12.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Civically Engaged Research? Understanding and Unpacking Researcher Motivations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2021

Jenn M. Jackson Open the ORCID record for Jenn M. Jackson [Opens in a new window] ,
Brian Shoup  and
H. Howell Williams Open the ORCID record for H. Howell Williams [Opens in a new window]
Jenn M. Jackson
Affiliation:
Syracuse University
Brian Shoup
Affiliation:
Mississippi State University
H. Howell Williams
Affiliation:
Western Connecticut State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Civically Engaged Research and Political Science
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , October 2021 , pp. 721 - 724
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ayoub, Phillip, and Rosa, Deondra. 2016. “In Defense of ‘Me’ Studies.” Inside Higher Ed, April 14.Google Scholar
Bassichis, Morgan, Lee, Alexander, and Spade, Dean. 2015. “Building an Abolitionist Trans and Queer Movement with Everything We’ve Got.” In Captive Genders: Trans Embodiment and the Prison Industrial Complex, ed. Stanley, Eric A. and Smith, Nat, 21–46. Chico, CA: AK Press.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, Kakali. 2016. “The Vulnerable Academic: Personal Narratives and Strategic De/colonizing of Academic Structures.” Qualitative Inquiry 22 (5): 309–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, Charlene. 2018. Unapologetic: A Black, Queer, and Feminist Mandate for Radical Movements. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Cathy J. 1999. The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDS and the Breakdown of Black Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Cathy J. 2010. Democracy Remixed: Black Youth and the Future of American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Combahee River Collective. 1983. “A Black Feminist Statement.” In This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color, ed. Moraga, Cherríe and Anzaldúa, Gloria, 234–44. Watertown, MA: Persephone Press.Google Scholar
Cramer, Katherine J. 2016. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, Michael L. 2020. “Respect for Subjects in the Ethics of Causal and Interpretive Social Explanation.” American Political Science Review 114 (4): 1001–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Linda. 1999. Fear as a Way of Life: Mayan Widows in Rural Guatemala. New York: Columbia University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=1Q7d2XcqpLcC.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill Collins, , , Patricia. 1986. “Learning from the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought.” Social Problems 33 (6): S14–S32. https://doi.org/10.2307/800672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Jenn M. 2019. “Breaking out of the Ivory Tower: (Re)Thinking Inclusion of Women and Scholars of Color in the Academy.” Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy 40 (1): 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jourde, Cédric. 2009. “The Ethnographic Sensibility: Overlooked Authoritarian Dynamics and Islamic Ambivalences.” In Political Ethnography, ed. Schatz, Edward, 201–16. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michener, Jamila. 2018. Fragmented Democracy: Medicaid, Federalism, and Unequal Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, Anne. 2004. “Political Science as a Vocation.” In Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics, ed. Shapiro, Ian, Smith, Rogers M., and Masoud, Tarek E., 67–82. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, Victor. 2016. “The Unbearable Whiteness of Mesearch.” Inside Higher Ed, October 26.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 2005. “Justice as a Larger Loyalty.” Ethical Perspectives 4 (3): 139–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatz, Edward. 2009. “Ethnographic Immersion and the Study of Politics.” In Political Ethnography, ed. Schatz, Edward, 1–22. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shdaimah, Corey, Stahl, Roland, and Schram, Sanford F.. 2009. “When You Can See the Sky through Your Roof: Policy Analysis from the Bottom Up.” In Political Ethnography, ed. Schatz, Edward, 255–74. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sokol, Rebeccah, Fisher, Edwin, and Hill, Julia. 2015. “Identifying Those Whom Health Promotion Hardly Reaches: A Systematic Review.” Evaluation & the Health Professions 38 (4): 518–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walsh, Katherine Cramer. 2009. “Scholars as Citizens: Studying Public Opinion through Ethnography.” In Political Ethnography, ed. Schatz, Edward, 165–82. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zuberi, Tukufu, and Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo. 2008. White Logic, White Methods: Racism and Methodology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar