Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:25:22.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Watching Election 2016 with a Gender Lens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2016

Kelly Dittmar
Kelly Dittmar*
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The presence of women candidates in both major parties’ presidential primaries, including a likely woman Democratic nominee, has increased the attention paid to gender dynamics in the 2016 US presidential election. However, the presumption that previous presidential elections—without female prominent contenders—were gender neutral is false: gender dynamics have been at play in all US presidential elections to date. The nation’s top executive office is arguably the most masculine in American politics. Duerst-Lahti (1997) describes the presidency as a gendered space in which masculine norms and images are reified as the ideal, adding, “the masculinist assumption-made-normal is strong and is made even stronger when it goes unnoticed for its gendered aspects” (22). Presidents and presidential contenders, whether male or female, are expected to meet the masculine expectations of the office through words and actions, and those around them—family, spouses, and advisors—often play a role in shaping the degree to which they are successful. In navigating American politics, candidates also face gendered treatment by opponents, voters, and media, reminding us that presidential politics is far from gender neutral. These gender dynamics have been detailed by scholars, particularly in analyses of the presidential candidacies of women (Beail and Longworth 2013; Carlin and Winfrey 2009; Carroll and Dittmar 2009; Dittmar and Carroll 2013; Duerst-Lahti 2013; Falk 2010; Han and Heldman 2007; Heldman, Carroll, and Olson 2005; Lawrence and Rose 2009; McClain, Carter, and Brady 2005). However, the depth and nuance in scholarly analyses are rarely evident in popular dialogue about the ways in which gender shapes presidential elections.

Type
From the Sections
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 49 , Special Issue 4: Elections in Focus , October 2016 , pp. 807 - 812
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beail, Linda and Longworth, Rhonda Kinney. 2013. Framing Sarah Palin: Pit Bulls, Puritans, and Politics. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Carlin, Diana B. and Winfrey, Kelly L.. 2009. “Have You Come a Long Way, Baby? Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, and Sexism in 2008 Campaign Coverage.” Communication Studies 60 (Sep–Oct): 326–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. and Dittmar, Kelly. 2009. “The 2008 candidacies of Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin: Cracking the ‘Highest, Hardest Glass Ceiling.’” In Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics, 2nd ed., eds. Carroll, Susan J. and Fox, Richard L.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 44–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, Kelly and Carroll, Susan J.. 2013. “Cracking the ‘Highest, Hardest Glass Ceiling’: Women as Presidential and Vice Presidential Contenders.” In Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics, 3rd ed., eds. Carroll, Susan J. and Fox, Richard L.. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2008. “Women as Candidates in American Politics: The Continuing Impact of Sex and Gender.” In Political Women and American Democracy, eds. Wolbrecht, Christina, Beckwith, Karen, and Baldez, Lisa, 110–127. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia. 1997. “Executive Power and the Consequences of Masculinism.” In The Other Elites: Women, Politics, and Power in the Executive Branch, eds. Anne Borrelli, Mary and Martin, Janet M.. Boulder, CO: Lynn Rienner.Google Scholar
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia. 2013. “Presidential Elections: Gendered Space and the Case of 2012.” In Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics, 3rd ed., eds. Carroll, Susan J. and Fox, Richard L.. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Falk, Erika. 2010. Women for President: Media Bias in Nine Campaigns, 2nd ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Han, Lori Cox and Heldman, Caroline, eds. 2007. Rethinking Madam President: Are We Ready for a Woman in the White House? Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Heldman, Caroline, Carroll, Susan J., and Olson, Stephanie. 2005. “‘She Brought Only a Skirt’: Print Media Coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s Bid for the Republican Presidential Nomination.” Political Communication 22 (3): 315–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Regina G. and Rose, Melody. 2010. Hillary Clinton’s Race for the White House: Gender Politics and the Media on the Campaign Trail. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
McClain, Paula D., Carter, Niambi M., and Brady, Michael C.. 2005. “Gender and Black Presidential Politics: From Chisholm to Moseley Braun.” Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy 27 (1–2): 31–50.Google Scholar