Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:44:15.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Teaching Wisdom to Interest: Book Five of Plato's Republic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2009

Timothy J. Lukes
Affiliation:
Santa Clara University
Mary F. Scudder
Affiliation:
University of Virginia

Abstract

We suggest that Book Five of the Republic, where Plato discusses the status of women in the guardian class, is a superb source of Platonic insight. For it is precisely the discussion of women that is most vulnerable to co-optation by the modern vernacular of interest, a vernacular to which the Republic is vehemently opposed. If students come to appreciate an alternative perspective regarding this most sensitive of modern issues, the full impact of the Socratic approach is available to them.

Type
The Teacher
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annas, Julia. 1996. “Plato's Republic and Feminism.” In Feminism and Ancient Philosophy, ed. Ward, Julie K.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arnhart, Larry. 1987. Political Questions: Political Philosophy from Plato to Rawls. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Bloom, Allan. 1991. The Republic of Plato. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bluestone, Natalie Harris. 1987. Women and Ideal Society: Plato's Republic and Modern Myths of Gender. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Cahn, Steven M. 2002. Classics of Political and Moral Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coole, Diana H. 1988. Women in Political Theory: From Ancient Misogyny to Contemporary Feminism. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1981. Public Man, Private Woman: Women in Social and Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Susan B. 1996. “Women's Nature and Role in the Ideal Polis.” In Feminism and Ancient Philosophy, ed. Ward, Julie K.. New York: Routledge, 1330.Google Scholar
Levinson, Ronald B. 1953. In Defense of Plato. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lukes, Timothy J. 2007. “Putting Space Between Beauty and Politics.” Chronicle of Higher Education 54 (December 21), B5.Google Scholar
McClelland, J. S. 1996. A History of Western Political Thought. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McDonald, L. C. 1968. Western Political Theory from Its Origins to the Present. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Basil G., and Lucas, J. R.. 2003. An Engagement With Plato's Republic: A Companion to the Republic. Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1991. “Philosopher Queens and Private Wives: Plato on Women and the Family.” In Feminist Interpretations and Political Theory, eds. Shanley, Mary Lyndon and Pateman, Carole. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1131.Google Scholar
Redhead, Brian. 1988. Political Thought from Plato to NATO. Chicago: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Sabine, George H. 1973. A History of Political Theory, 4th ed., rev. by Thorson, Thomas Landon. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 2008. Political Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Elizabeth, and Blocker, H. Gene. 1994. Applied Social and Political Philosophy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1987. “Plato.” In History of Political Philosophy, 3rd ed., ed. Srauss, Leo and Cropsey, Joseph. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wolff, Jonathan. 2006 [1996]. An Introduction to Political Philosophy, revised ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. 2004 [1960]. Politics and Vision, expanded ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar