Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:01:37.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mixed-Methods Research in the Study of Welfare States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2017

Sara Niedzwiecki  and
David Nunnally
Sara Niedzwiecki
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
David Nunnally
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: The Road Less Traveled: An Agenda for Mixed-Methods Research
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , October 2017 , pp. 1028 - 1031
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Borges Sugiyama, Natasha. 2013. Diffusion of Good Government: Social Sector Reforms in Brazil. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Crepaz, Markus. 2008. Trust beyond Borders: Immigration, the Welfare State, and Identity in Modern Societies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Emmenegger, Patrick, Kvist, Jon, Marx, Paul, and Petersen, Klaus. 2015. “Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism: The Making of a Classic.” Journal of European Social Policy 25 (1): 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, Alexander M. 1999. Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism: A Century of Income Security Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S. 2005. “Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Cross-National Research.” American Political Science Review 99 (3): 435–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mares, Isabela. 2005. “Social Protection around the World: External Insecurity, State Capacity, and Domestic Political Cleavages.” Comparative Political Studies 38 (6): 623–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niedzwiecki, Sara. 2016. “Social Policies, Attribution of Responsibility, and Political Alignments: A Subnational Analysis of Argentina and Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies 49 (4): 457–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niedzwiecki, Sara. 2017. Uneven Social Policies: The Politics of Subnational Variation in Latin America. Book manuscript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 1989. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Singh, Prerna. 2015. How Solidarity Works for Welfare: Subnationalism and Social Development in India. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Richard. 2001. “Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36 (1): 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Niedzwiecki and Nunnally supplementary material

Niedzwiecki and Nunnally supplementary material 1

Download Niedzwiecki and Nunnally supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 345.2 KB