No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Evolution of Political Theory in Berkeley in a Climate of Experiment and Secession
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 June 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Symposium: The “Berkeley School” of Political Theory: A Discussion of its Beginnings, its Development, and the Disagreements over Calling it a “School”
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017
References
REFERENCES
GIEC: German Intellectual Émigrés Collection, M.E. Grenander Department of Special Collections and Archives, University Libraries, The University at Albany, State University of New York.Google Scholar
RAC: Rockefeller Archive Center, Sleepy Hollow, NY.Google Scholar
RF: Rockefeller Foundation Records.Google Scholar
UCA: University of California Archives, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
BED: Board of Educational Development Records
Google Scholar
JEC: Journal of Educational Change Records
Google Scholar
OCR: Office of the Chancellor Records
Google Scholar
OPR: Office of the President Records
Google Scholar
SCE: Select Committee on Education Records (the Muscatine Report), 1965–66Google Scholar
UCDA: University of California History Digital Archive (http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/uchistory).Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 1999. Department & Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bilorusky, John A. 1972. Reconstitution at Berkeley: The Quest for Self-Determination. PhD Dissertation. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Burdick, Eugene and Brodbeck, Arthur J. (eds.). 1959. American Voting Behavior. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
“The Culture of the University: Governance and Education.”
1968. Report of the Study Commission on University Governance. University of California, Berkeley. January 15. From the Personal Papers of Jeff Lustig.Google Scholar
Hauptmann, Emily. 2006. “From Opposition to Accommodation: How Rockefeller Foundation Grants Redefined Relations between Political Theory and Social Science in the 1950s.”
American Political Science Review
100 (4): 643–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Norman. 1999, 2000. Tape-recorded interviews by the author. Reno, NV, November 6 and January 4. American Political Science Association Oral History Archive. Lexington: University of Kentucky Library.Google Scholar
Kerr, Clark. 1963/1982. The Uses of the University, 3rd edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mathiowetz, Dean (ed.) 2016. Hanna Fenichel Pitkin: Politics, Justice, Action. New York: Routledge Innovators in Political Thought.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClosky, Herbert and Schaar, John H.. 1965. “Psychological Dimensions of Anomy.”
American Sociological Review
30: 14–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E. 1988. Tape-recorded interview by Heinz Eulau. Scottsdale, AZ, February 11. American Political Science Association Oral History Archive. Lexington: University of Kentucky Library.Google Scholar
“Political Science at Berkeley: An Invitation to a Discussion.”
1969. No author. From the personal papers of Jeff Lustig.Google Scholar
Sarf, Hal. 2002. Masters and Disciples.
Berkeley, CA: Center for Humanities and Contemporary Culture & Regent Press.Google Scholar
Trow, Katherine Bernhardi. 1998. Habits of Mind: The Experimental College Program at Berkeley. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1992. “On Being a Department Chair.”
PS: Political Science and Politics
25: 83–9.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1969. “Political Theory as a Vocation.”
American Political Science Review
63: 1062–82.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1992. Tape-recorded interview by Nicholas Xenos. Whitethorn, CA, July 10–11. American Political Science Association Oral History Archive. Lexington: University of Kentucky Library.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. and Schaar, John H.. 1967/1970. “The University Revolution.” Reprinted in The Berkeley Rebellion and Beyond: Essays on Politics and Education in the Technological Society. New York: The New York Review of Books, distributed by Random House.Google Scholar
GIEC: German Intellectual Émigrés Collection, M.E. Grenander Department of Special Collections and Archives, University Libraries, The University at Albany, State University of New York.Google Scholar
RAC: Rockefeller Archive Center, Sleepy Hollow, NY.Google Scholar
RF: Rockefeller Foundation Records.Google Scholar
UCA: University of California Archives, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
BED: Board of Educational Development Records
Google Scholar
JEC: Journal of Educational Change Records
Google Scholar
OCR: Office of the Chancellor Records
Google Scholar
OPR: Office of the President Records
Google Scholar
SCE: Select Committee on Education Records (the Muscatine Report), 1965–66Google Scholar
UCDA: University of California History Digital Archive (http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/uchistory).Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 1999. Department & Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bilorusky, John A. 1972. Reconstitution at Berkeley: The Quest for Self-Determination. PhD Dissertation. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Burdick, Eugene and Brodbeck, Arthur J. (eds.). 1959. American Voting Behavior. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
“The Culture of the University: Governance and Education.”
1968. Report of the Study Commission on University Governance. University of California, Berkeley. January 15. From the Personal Papers of Jeff Lustig.Google Scholar
Hauptmann, Emily. 2006. “From Opposition to Accommodation: How Rockefeller Foundation Grants Redefined Relations between Political Theory and Social Science in the 1950s.”
American Political Science Review
100 (4): 643–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Norman. 1999, 2000. Tape-recorded interviews by the author. Reno, NV, November 6 and January 4. American Political Science Association Oral History Archive. Lexington: University of Kentucky Library.Google Scholar
Kerr, Clark. 1963/1982. The Uses of the University, 3rd edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mathiowetz, Dean (ed.) 2016. Hanna Fenichel Pitkin: Politics, Justice, Action. New York: Routledge Innovators in Political Thought.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClosky, Herbert and Schaar, John H.. 1965. “Psychological Dimensions of Anomy.”
American Sociological Review
30: 14–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E. 1988. Tape-recorded interview by Heinz Eulau. Scottsdale, AZ, February 11. American Political Science Association Oral History Archive. Lexington: University of Kentucky Library.Google Scholar
“Political Science at Berkeley: An Invitation to a Discussion.”
1969. No author. From the personal papers of Jeff Lustig.Google Scholar
Sarf, Hal. 2002. Masters and Disciples.
Berkeley, CA: Center for Humanities and Contemporary Culture & Regent Press.Google Scholar
Trow, Katherine Bernhardi. 1998. Habits of Mind: The Experimental College Program at Berkeley. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1992. “On Being a Department Chair.”
PS: Political Science and Politics
25: 83–9.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1969. “Political Theory as a Vocation.”
American Political Science Review
63: 1062–82.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1992. Tape-recorded interview by Nicholas Xenos. Whitethorn, CA, July 10–11. American Political Science Association Oral History Archive. Lexington: University of Kentucky Library.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. and Schaar, John H.. 1967/1970. “The University Revolution.” Reprinted in The Berkeley Rebellion and Beyond: Essays on Politics and Education in the Technological Society. New York: The New York Review of Books, distributed by Random House.Google Scholar