Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:18:09.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emerging Models of Collaboration in Political Science: Changes, Benefits, and Challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2010

Rose McDermott  and
Peter K. Hatemi
Rose McDermott
Affiliation:
Brown University
Peter K. Hatemi
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In increasing numbers, political scientists are engaging in collaborative research. It is useful to consider the advantages of such efforts and to suggest strategies for finding optimal collaborators. In addition, there are issues and challenges that arise in the face of increased collaboration, particularly interdisciplinary collaboration across the life and social sciences. Inevitably, as the discipline has moved from a dominant solo-author model to a wider array of authorship possibilities, whether those teams encompass two-person partnerships, large research teams, or something in between, new administrative and cultural questions have already begun to surface as the discipline works to assimilate these changes. Consonant with previous efforts by the American Political Science Association (Biggs 2008; Chandra et al. 2006), we seek here to continue a broader disciplinary conversation surrounding the opportunities and challenges posed by more diverse patterns of teamwork. In so doing, we hope to help continue to encourage transparent, predictable, and openly collaborative intellectual partnerships wherein individuals receive the institutional credit and merit they deserve.

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , January 2010 , pp. 49 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abt, Helmut A. 2007. “The Future of Single-Authored Papers.” Scientometrics 73 (3): 353–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James D., Black, Grant C., Clemmons, J. Roger, and Stephan, Paula E.. 2005. “Scientific Teams and Institutional Collaborations: Evidence from U.S. Universities, 1981–1999.” Research Policy 34 (3): 259–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, P. 2001. “Market, Hierarchy and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism.” Organizational Science 12 (2): 215–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adolphs, R. 2003. “Cognitive Neuroscience of Human Social Behavior.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4 (March): 165–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Ghamdi, A., Al-Harbi, M., Beacom, N. A. B., Dedolph, J., Deignan, M., Elftmann, C., Finley, N. et al. 1998. “Authorship in JASIS: A Quantitative Analysis.” Katherine Sharp Review 6. http://edfu.lis.uiuc.edu/6/al_ghamdi.pdf.Google Scholar
Amabile, Teresa M., Patterson, Chelley, Mueller, Jennifer, Wojcik, Tom, Odomirok, Paul W., Marsh, Mel, and Kramer, S. J.. 2001. “Academic-Practitioner Collaboration in Management Research: A Case of Cross-Profession Collaboration.” The Academy of Management Journal 44 (2): 418–31.Google Scholar
Baldi, S. 1998. “Normative versus Social Constructivist Processes in the Allocation of Citations: A Network-Analytic Model.” American Sociological Review 63: 829–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, A. H., Ault, R. W., and Kaserman, D. L.. 1988. “The Rising Incidence of Co-Authorship in Economics: Further Evidence.” Review of Economics and Statistics 70: 539–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, J. 2008. “Allocating the Credit in Collaborative Research.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41 (1): 246–47.Google Scholar
Chandra, K., Gandhi, J., King, G., Lupia, A., and Mansfield, E.. 2006. “Report of APSA Working Group on Collaboration.” http://www.apsanet.org/imgtest/CollaborationReport08-09-06.pdf.Google Scholar
Choi, Jin. 1988. “An Analysis of Authorship in Anthropology Journals, 1963 and 1983.” Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian 6 (3–4): 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, Kee H., Cox, Raymond A. K., and Kim, Kenneth A.. 2009. “On the Relation between Intellectual Collaboration and Intellectual Output: Evidence from the Finance Academe.” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 49 (3): 893–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, D. 1972. Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
De Maio, Gerald, and Kushner, Harold. 1981. “Quantification and Multiple Authorships in Political Science.” The Journal of Politics 43 (1): 181–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, A. M. 1985. “The Money Value of Citations to Single-Authored and Multiple-Authored Articles.” Scientometrics 8: 315–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingfelder, Sadie. 2005. “Psychological Science Branches Out.” APA Monitor 36 (5).Google Scholar
Durden, G. C., and Perri, T. J.. 1995. “Coauthorship and Publication Efficiency.” Atlantic Economic Journal 23: 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaves, Lindon J., and Hatemi, Peter K.. 2008. “Transmission of Attitudes toward Abortion and Gay Rights: Parental Socialization or Parental Mate Selection?” Behavior Genetics 38: 247–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, Bonnie S., Cobane, Craig T., Vander Ven, Thomas M., and Cullen, Francis T.. 1998. “How Many Authors Does It Take to Publish an Article? Trends and Patterns in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 31 (4): 847–56.Google Scholar
Fowler, James, and Schreiber, Darren. 2008. “Biology, Politics and the Emerging Science of Human Nature.” Science 322 (5903): 912–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldfinch, S., Dale, T., and DeRouen, K.. 2003. “Science from the Periphery: Publication, Collaboration and ‘Periphery Effects’ in Article Citation Rates of the New Zealand Crown Research Institutes, 1995–2000.” Scientometrics 57 (3): 321–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Jerrold. 2002. “Patterns of Collaboration in Mathematical Research.” SIAM News 35 (9): 1–3.Google Scholar
Hagedoorn, John, Link, Albert N., and Vonortas, Nicholas S.. 2000. “Research Partnerships.” Research Policy 29: 567–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamel, Gary, Doz, Yves L., and Prahalad, C. K.. 1989. “Collaborate with Your Competitors and Win.” Harvard Business Review 67 (1): 133.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, M. A. 1993. “Multiple Authors, Multiple Problems—Bibliometrics and the Study of Scholarly Collaboration: A Literature Review.” Library and Information Science Research 15: 325–54.Google Scholar
Hart, Richard L. 2007. “Collaboration and Article Quality in the Literature of Academic Librarianship.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 33 (2): 190–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatemi, Peter K., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, J. R., Medland, M. C., Martin, N. G., and Eaves, L. J.. 2008. “Finding the Political Gene: Results from Separate Genome Wide Linkage and 5-HTTPLR Allelic Association.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hatemi, Peter K., Funk, Carolyn, Maes, Hermine, Silberg, Judy, Medland, Sarah, Martin, Nicholas, and Eaves, Lindon. 2009. “Genetic Influences on Social Attitudes over the Life Course.” Journal of Politics 71 (3): 1141–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, Aidan. 2001. “Co-authorship and the Output of Academic Economists.” Labour Economics 8 (4): 503–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, James. 1996. “Trends in Multi-Authored Papers in Economics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (3): 153–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Laura A., and Leahey, Erin. 2008. “Collaborative Research in Sociology: Trends and Contributing Factors.” The American Sociologist 39 (4): 290–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., and Bloom, P.. 2009. “Conservatives Are More Easily Disgusted than Liberals.” Cognition and Emotion 23 (4): 714–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaschik, Scott. 2007. “Who Gets Credit?” Inside Higher Education, July 20. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/07/20/credit.Google Scholar
Katz, J. S., and Hicks, D.. 1997. “How Much Is Collaboration Worth? A Calibrated Bibliometric Model.” Scientometrics 40: 541–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. Sylvan, and Martin, Ben R.. 1997. “What Is Research Collaboration?” Research Policy 26: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koehler, W. C., Anderson, A. D., Dowdy, B. A., Fields, D. E., Golden, M., Hall, D., Johnson, A. C. et al. 2000. “A Profile in Statistics of Journal Articles: Fifty Years of American Documentation and the Journal of the American Society for Information Science.” CyberMetrics 4 (December): Paper 3.Google Scholar
Lawani, S. 1986. “Some Bibliometric Correlates of Quality in Scientific Research.” Scientometrics 9 (1–2): 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leahey, Erin, and Reikowsky, Ryan. 2008. “Research Specialization and Collaboration Patterns in Sociology.” Social Studies of Science 38 (3): 425–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebowitz, S., and Palmer, J.. 1984. “Assessing the Relative Impacts of Economics Journals.” Journal of Economic Literature 22 (1): 77–88.Google Scholar
Luukkonen, Terttu, Persson, Olle, and Sivertsen, Gunnar. 1992. “Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration.” Science, Technology & Human Values 17 (1): 101–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, B. R. 1996. “The Use of Multiple Indicators in the Assessment of Basic Research.” Scientometrics 36: 343–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, R., Tingley, D., Cowden, J., Frazzetto, G., and Johnson, D.. 2009. “Monoamine Oxidase A Gene (MAOA) Predicts Behavioral Aggression Following Provocation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (7): 2118–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDowell, J. M., and Smith, J. K.. 1992. “The Effect of Gender Sorting on Propensity to Coauthor: Implications for Academic Promotion.” Economic Inquiry 30: 68–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. M., and Melvin, M.. 1983. “The Determinants of Coauthorship: Analysis of the Economics Literature.” Review of Economics and Statistics 65: 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medoff, Marshall H. 2003. “Collaboration and the Quality of Economics Research.” Labour Economics 10 (5): 597–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert. 1973. The Structure of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. M., Rutter, M., Silberg, J. L., Maes, H. H., Simonoff, E., Shillady, L. L., Pickles, A., Hewitt, J. K., and Eaves, L. J.. 2000. “Familial Aggregation for Conduct Disorder Symptomatology: The Role of Genes, Marital Discord and Family Adaptability.” Psychological Medicine 30 (4): 759–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, M. E. 2004. “Coauthorship Networks and Patterns of Scientific Collaboration.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101: 5200–05.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orbell, John, Morikawa, Tomonori, Hartwig, Jason, Hanley, James, and Allen, Nicholas. 2004. “‘Machiavellian’ Intelligence and the Evolution of Cooperative Dispositions.” The American Political Science Review 98 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxley, Douglas, Smith, Kevin B., Alford, John R., Hibbing, Matthew V., Miller, Jennifer L., Scalora, Mario, Hatemi, Peter K., Hibbing, John R.. 2008. “Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits.” Science 321 (5896): 1667–670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phelan, T. J. 1999. “A Compendium of Issues for Citation Analysis.” Scientometrics 45: 117–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presser, Stanley. 1980. “Collaboration and the Quality of Research.” Social Studies of Science 10 (1): 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Derek J. de Solla. 1963. Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, D., and Beaver, D.. 1966. “Collaboration in an Invisible College.” American Psychologist 21: 1011–018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozin, P., Haidt, J., and Fincher, K.. 2009. “From Oral to Moral.” Science 323: 1179–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruef, Martin. Forthcoming. The Entrepreneurial Group: Social Identities, Networks, and Collective Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sanfey, A.G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., and Cohen, J.D.. 2003. “The Neural Basis of Economic Decision Making in the Ultimatum Game.” Science 300: 1755–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shergill, Sukhwinder, Bays, Paul M., Frith, Chris D., and Wolpert, Daniel M.. 2003. “Two Eyes for an Eye: The Neuroscience of Force Escalation.” Science 301 (5630): 187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spezio, Michael, Rangel, Antonio, Alvarez, Michael, O'Doherty, John, Mattes, Kyle, Todorov, Alexander, Kim, Hackkin, and Adolphs, Ralph. 2008. “A Neural Basis for the Effect of Candidate Appearance on Election Outcomes.” Social Cognition and Neuroscience 3: 344–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Sun Tzu, Tzu. 1910. On the Art of War: The Oldest Military Treatise in the World. Trans. Lionel Giles. London: Luzac.Google Scholar
Tarnow, Eugen. 2002. “Coauthorship in Physics.” Science and Engineering Ethics 8: 175–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., and Moll, H.. 2005. “Understanding and Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Cultural Cognition.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5): 675–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westen, Drew, Blagov, Pavel S., Harenski, Keith, Kilts, Clint, and Hamann, Stephan. 2006. “Neural Bases of Motivated Reasoning: An fMRI Study of Emotional Constraints on Partisan Political Judgment in the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 (11): 1947–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wrangham, R.W. 1999. “The Evolution of Coalitionary Killing.” Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 42: 1–30.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Cheryl. 1995. “An Assessment of Articles Published by Women in 15 Top Political Science Journals.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28 (3): 525–33.Google Scholar
Zeng, M, and Chen, X.. 2003. “Achieving Cooperation in Multiparty Alliances: A Social Dilemma Approach to Partnership Management.” Journal of Management Science 28 (4): 587–605.Google Scholar