Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:02:51.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Television Erode Social Capital? A Reply to Putnam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Pippa Norris
Pippa Norris*
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the past thirty-five years many commentators have expressed concern about declining support for the American political system, noting familiar evidence of the steady erosion in electoral turnout (Stanley and Niemi 1995, 78; Teixeira 1992), falling participation in political parties (Rosenstone and Hansen 1993), plummeting levels of political trust (Lipset and Schneider 1987), and weakening civic engagement (Putnam 1995a). Evidence for declining confidence in American government is well-established. The standard National Election Study measures show that in 1954 three-quarters of the American public trusted government in Washington to do what was right ‘just about always or most of the time’. By 1994, a quarter of the public proved as trusting. Moreover how far Americans trust each other—or social trust—has also fallen by more than a third since the early sixties (Uslaner 1995; Putnam 1995a).

Not all the evidence points in the same direction, and some alternative forms of political activity may have risen over time (Verba et al. 1995, 70–71). Moreover comparative research (Klingemann and Fuchs 1995) provides no evidence for a uniform secular decline in electoral turnout and confidence in government across advanced democracies, as sometimes assumed by observers. Nevertheless it is widely believed that American democracy has been experiencing a crisis of legitimacy, with angry voters disillusioned by Washington politics as usual.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 474 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brehm, John and Rahn, Wendy. 1995. “An Audit of the Deficit in Social Capital.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack. 1974. “Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Government.” American Political Science Review 68: 973–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crewe, Ivor. 1991. “Electoral Participation.” In Democracy at the Polls, eds. Butler, David, Penniman, Howard R. and Ranney, Austin. Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar
Fallows, James. 1996. Breaking the News: How the News Media Undermine American Democracy. New York: Pantheon Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark. 1996. “Electoral Participation.” In Comparing Democracies: Voting and Elections in Global Perspective, eds. LeDuc, Lawrence, Neimi, Richard and Norris, Pippa. Newbury, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gerbner, George, Gross, Larry, Morgan, Michael and Signorielli, Nancy. 1980. “The Mainstreaming of America.” Journal of Communication 30:10–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Roderick. 1994. Seducing America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klingmann, Hans-Dieter and Fuchs, Dieter, eds. 1995. Citizens and the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kohut, Andrew and Parker, Kimberly. 1996. “Talk Radio and Gender Politics.” In Women, Politics and Media, ed. Norris, Pippa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin and Schneider, William. 1987. The Confidence Gap. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1996. “Political Communication in Election Campaigns: Reconsidering Media Effects.” In British Elections Parties Yearbook, eds. Railings, Colin et al. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Patterson, Thomas. 1993. Out of Order. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox and Cloward, Richard A.. 1988. Why Americans Don't Vote. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Postman, Neil. 1985. Amusing Ourselves to Death. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 1982. Contemporary Democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1996. “The Strange Disappearance of Civic America.” The American Prospect 24 (Winter).Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1995a. “Bowling Alone, Revisited”. The Journal of Democracy. 6(1):65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1995b. “Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America.” PS: Political Science & Politics. 27(4):664–683.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1994. Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J. and Hansen, John Mark. 1993. Mobilisation, Participation and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stanley, Harold W. and Niemi, Richard G. Vital Statistics on American Politics. 5th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Teixeira, Ruy A. 1992. The Disappearing American Voter. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Uslaner, Eric. 1995. “Faith, Hope and Charity: Social Capital, Trust and Collective Action.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, Cees, Franklin, Mark et al. 1996. Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of the Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney and Nie, Norman. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Nie, Norman H. and Kim, Jae-On. 1980. Participation and Political Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman and Brady, Henry E. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolflnger, Raymond and Rosenstone, Steven J. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar