Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T14:13:57.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Confronting a Crisis of Research Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2014

Jody LaPorte*
Affiliation:
University of Oxford

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Fieldwork in Political Science: Encountering Challenges and Crafting Solutions
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beissinger, Mark. 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ekiert, Grzegorz, and Kubik, Jan. 1999. Rebellious Civil Society: Popular Protest and Democratic Consolidation in Poland, 1989–1993. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute for Strategic Studies. 2004. The Military Balance. London: Institute for Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana, MacLean, Lauren Morris, and Read, Benjamin. 2014. Field Research in Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Evan. 2004. “Preparing for Field Research,” Qualitative Methods: Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section on Qualitative Methods 2(1): 37.Google Scholar
Lynch, Julia. 2004. “Tracking Progress While in the Field,” Qualitative Methods: Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section on Qualitative Methods 2(1): 1015.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty and Jaggers, Keith. 2006. Polity IV Dataset. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, Univ. of Maryland. Accessed at www.cidcm.umd.edu/polityGoogle Scholar