Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:43:30.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Organizing Approach to Diversifying Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2020

Fernando Tormos-Aponte Open the ORCID record for Fernando Tormos-Aponte [Opens in a new window]
Fernando Tormos-Aponte*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Racial and Ethnic Diversity Within Political Science
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , January 2021 , pp. 163 - 168
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Political Science Association. 2011. “Political Science in the 21st Century.” Report of the Task Force. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association. Available at www.apsanet.org/portals/54/Files/Task%20Force%20Reports/TF_21st%20Century_AllPgs_webres90.pdf.Google Scholar
Beaulieu, Emily, Boydstun, Amber E., Brown, Nadia E., Dionne, Kim Yi, Gillespie, Andra, Klar, Samara, Krupnikov, Yanna, Michelson, Melissa R., Searles, Kathleen, and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2017. “Women Also Know Stuff: Meta-Level Mentoring to Battle Gender Bias in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (3): 779–83. DOI:10.1017/S1049096517000580.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2015. “State, Academy, Discipline: Regendering Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (3): 445–49.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. “The Scholastic Point of View.” Cultural Anthropology 5 (4): 380–91.Google Scholar
Bracey, Glenn E. 2016. “Black Movements Need Black Theorizing: Exposing Implicit Whiteness in Political Process Theory.” Sociological Focus 49 (1): 11–27.Google Scholar
Brockett, Charles. 1991. “The Structure of Political Opportunities and Peasant Mobilization in Central America.” Comparative Politics 23:253–74.Google Scholar
Brown, Nadia. 2019. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 40 (1): 1–6. DOI:10.1080/1554477X.2019.1563413.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Charlene. 2018. Unapologetic: A Black, Queer, and Feminist Mandate for Radical Movements. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Lauren Hamilton, Holmes, Maja Husar, and Sowa, Jessica E.. 2019. “Including Women in Public Affairs Departments: Diversity Is Not Enough.” Journal of Public Affairs Education 25 (2): 163–84. DOI:10.1080/15236803.2018.1565051.Google Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx, and Roth, Silke. 1998. “Gender, Class, and the Interaction between Social Movements: A Strike of West Berlin Day Care Workers.” Gender and Society 12 (6): 626–48.Google Scholar
Ganz, Marshall. 2009. Why David Sometimes Wins: Leadership, Organization, and Strategy in the California Farm Worker Movement. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Han, Hahrie. 2014. How Organizations Develop Activists: Civic Associations and Leadership in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herring, Cedric, and Henderson, Loren. 2014. “The Critical Diversity Perspective.” In Diversity in Organizations, ed. Herring, Cedric and Henderson, Loren, 11–30. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Jackson, Jenn M. 2019. “Breaking Out of the Ivory Tower: (Re)Thinking Inclusion of Women and Scholars of Color in the Academy.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 40 (1): 195–203. DOI:10.1080/1554477X.2019.1565459.Google Scholar
Kenney, Sally J. 1996. “New Research on Gendered Political Institutions.” Political Research Quarterly 49 (2): 445–66.Google Scholar
Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2015. “Advancing Women in Political Science: Navigating Gendered Structures of Opportunity.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (3): 450–53.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Koopmans, Ruud, Duyvendak, Jan Willem, and Giugni, Marco G.. 1995. The Politics of New Social Movements in Western Europe. A Comparative Analysis. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press and University College of London Press.Google Scholar
Lavariega Monforti, Jessica L., and Michelson, Melissa R.. 2020. “Building our Communities: Women of Color Workshops in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (1): 141–43.Google Scholar
Casarez, Lemi, Danielle, Maricruz Osorio, and Rush, Tye. 2020. “Introducing People of Color Also Know Stuff.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (1): 140–41.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 1998. “Gendering Research in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 1 (1): 333–56.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’.” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1996. “Political Opportunities: Conceptual Origins, Current Problems, Future Directions.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, ed. McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., 1–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McBride, Dorothy E., and Mazur, Amy G.. 2010. The Politics of State Feminism: Innovation in Comparative Research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
McCammon, Holly J., Campbell, Karen E., Granberg, Ellen M., and Mowery, Christine. 2001. “How Movements Win: Gendered Opportunity Structures and US Women’s Suffrage Movements, 1866 to 1919.” American Sociological Review 66 (1): 49–70.Google Scholar
Mealy, Kimberly A. 2015. “Forging Inclusive Diversity Coalitions within Associations.” Paper presented at the 2015 National Science Foundation Workshop on Coalition Building to Advance Diverse Leadership and Address Discrimination in Political Science and Law and Social Sciences. Arlington, VA, January 7–9.Google Scholar
Mealy, Kimberly A. 2018. “American Political Science Association Diversity and Inclusion Report.” Washington, DC: American Political Science Association. Available at http://betan.apsanet.org/Portals/54/diversity%20and%20inclusion%20prgms/DIV%20reports/Diversity%20Report%20Executive%20-%20Final%20Draft%20-%20Web%20version.pdf.Google Scholar
Minta, Michael D., and Sinclair-Chapman, Valeria. 2012. “Diversity in Political Institutions and Congressional Responsiveness to Minority Interests.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (1): 127–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Aldon. 1984. The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rucht, Dieter. 1996. “The Impact of National Contexts on Social Movement Structures: A Cross- Movement and Cross-National Perspective.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, ed. McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., 185–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shames, Shauna. 2019. “Why I Do Activist Work within the Discipline.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy (40) 1: 129–30. DOI:10.1080/1554477X.2019.1563419.Google Scholar
Sinclair-Chapman, Valeria. 2015. “Leveraging Diversity in Political Science for Institutional and Disciplinary Change.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (3): 454–58.Google Scholar
Strolovitch, Dara. 2007. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tormos, Fernando. 2017. “Intersectional Solidarity.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 5 (4): 707–20.Google Scholar
Tormos-Aponte, Fernando. 2019. “Enacting Intersectional Solidarity in the Puerto Rican Student Movement.” In Gendered Mobilizations, ed. Irvine, Jill, Lang, Sabine, and Montoya, Celeste, 171–87. London: Rowman & Littlefield International, Ltd. Google Scholar
Tormos-Aponte, Fernando, and Velez-Serrano, Mayra. 2020. “Broadening the Pathway for Graduate Studies in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (1): 145–46.Google Scholar
Watkins Liu, Callie. 2017. “The Anti-Oppressive Value of Critical Race Theory and Intersectionality in Social Movement Study.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 4 (3): 1–16.Google Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2006. “Inclusion, Solidarity and Social Movements: The Global Movement on Gender Violence.” Perspectives on Politics 4 (1): 55–74.Google Scholar
Willoughby-Herard, Tiffany. 2019. “Poetic Labors and Challenging Political Science: An Epistolary Poem.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 40 (1): 228–35. DOI:10.1080/1554477X.2019.1565465.Google Scholar