No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
6. Preliminary Report on the Cephalopoda collected by H.M.S. “Challenger.” Part II. The Decapoda
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 September 2014
Extract
It is rather remarkable that the Decapoda should have yielded fewer new forms than the Octopoda, although judging by the number of genera contained in them, the former is a much more extensive group than the latter, and is furthermore represented by a larger number in the “Challenger” collection, as the following synopsis will show :–
- Type
- Proceedings 1184-85
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1886
References
note * page 281 In this synopsis several forms to which Professor Steenstrup had given MS. names are reckoned as new, and a number of immature forms are not included.
note * page 282 This seems to be at all events congeneric with a form which Professor Verrill has recently dredged in the North Atlantic, and named Benthoteuthis megalops (Trans. Connect. Acad., vol. vi. part 2, page 402, pi. xliv. fig. 1).
note * page 283 The specimen which Verrill figures (Trans. Connect. Acad., vol. v. p. 302, pi. xxvii. figs. 1, 2, 1882Google Scholar) is certainly not Taonius hyperboreus, Stp. I have elsewhere adduced arguments for believing it to be Taonius pavo (Les.), (Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edin., vol. viii. p. 319, 1885).Google Scholar
note † page 283 Loc. cit., p. 408, pi. Ivi. figs. 1 a, a′, a″, 1881.Google Scholar
note * page 286 With respect to this and one or two other points in the description it must be remembered that the specimens are immature.
note * page 292 The description of the hectocotylus is taken from a specimen in the Copenhagen Museum.
note * page 294 Called after Mr Edgar A. Smith, F.Z.S., of the British Museum.
note * page 304 Whence the specific name.
note † page 304 Named after Dr Georg Pfeffer of the Hamburg Museum.