Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:47:00.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2. Biographical Notice of the late Professor Henderson

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2015

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In undertaking the task which has been assigned me, of laying before the Society a brief history of the life and labours of one of their most valuable members, I am influenced as much by my regard for the deceased, as by my duty to the Society. I feel that, in a place where I am a comparative stranger, I have lost a friend—a loss the greatness of which can only be appreciated by those who have experienced, as I have done, the integrity of his character, and the warmth of his heart. Mr Henderson was a man whose every action was the dictate of a right conscience. With society, his intercourse was marked by an utter want of selfishness—a rare characteristic; with his friends, it was stamped with true and unostentatious kind-heartedness.

Type
Proceedings 1844-45
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1850

References

page 42 note * On this subject I beg to refer to my friend Mr Main's admirable memoir in the Transactions of the Astronomical Society, v. . It may be interesting to add the following remarks from a private communication of his to myself:—“At the time when I was requested to draw up a memoir on the subject of annual parallax, the amount of evidence of its sensible existence for any star whatever, which had even arisen from the discussion of investigations previous to Bessel's, was exceedingly small; and I believe that, at that time, any new attempt was likely to be received with the smile of incredulity, which repeated failures will always, in the long-run, tend to produce. No sensation was caused in England by the announcement of Bessel's investigation; and I remember that, to some astronomers, his confidence in the certainty of his result seemed far from warranted. At present there exists very little scepticism with respect to our knowledge of the parallax of 61 Cygni. But it was deduced by a method with which English astronomers were, I may assert, in general, unfamiliar, perhaps through the want of a good heliometer . . . . . It was an evidence of very creditable faith, therefore, which induced Mr Henderson, in default of other means, to attack this star rigorously by meridian observations in both elements, and this notwithstanding his accurate knowledge (for no man living excelled him in his knowledge of every thing that had been done in every department of modern practical astronomy, from its commencement) of that total failure of every attempt that had been made under the ablest astronomers of this country, in the northern hemisphere. And so fully was he impressed with the conviction of his ultimate success, that he left it as a legacy to his successor, who has sent over a very complete and beautiful series of observations, which, after their discussion by Mr Henderson himself, not long before his decease, has, in the minds of many, pretty nearly decided affirmatively the question of the existence of a considerable parallax.”