Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:47:19.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vitamin D deficiency negatively affects total bone mineral density in adult Brazilian women living in Southern England: baseline results of the D-SOL study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2018

M.M. Mendes
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK, GU2 7XH
K.H. Hart
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK, GU2 7XH
P.B. Botelho
Affiliation:
Faculty of Nutrition, Federal University of Goiás, GO, Brazil.
S.A. Lanham-New
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK, GU2 7XH
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2018 

Vitamin D deficiency, defined as 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) serum concentrations below 25 nmol/l, may reduce calcium absorption resulting in a defect in bone matrix mineralization that leads to rickets in children and osteomalacia/osteoporosis in adults. Low 25(OH)D serum concentrations have been associated with low bone mineral density and risk of fractures(Reference Lips and van Schoor1). The D-SOL study (A Systems Biology Approach to the Interaction between Vitamin D Supplementation and Sunlight Exposure in Brazilian Women living in Opposite Latitudes) involves two parallel vitamin D randomised controlled trials, one held in the UK and the other in Brazil, with identical study designs.

This cross sectional sub-analysis aimed to investigate the association between vitamin D status and bone health parameters in Brazilian women living in Southern England and included 51 Brazilian women aged 20–59 years recruited for the D-SOL UK RCT arm in December 2016. Radial bone geometry and density were measured using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) at diaphyseal (66 %) and distal (4 %) sites. Serum 25(OH)D concentration was measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

At baseline, mean vitamin D status was 35·12 ± 15·11 nmol/l, with 27·5 % of the women below the vitamin D deficiency cut-off of 25 nmol/l(2). A total of 54·9 % of the women had vitamin D levels below 50 nmol/l, which is defined as ‘vitamin D inadequacy’ by the US Institute of Medicine(3). Women with vitamin D deficiency had significantly lower total volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) (p = 0·015) and cortical vBMD (p = 0·03) at the diaphyseal site than those presenting vitamin D inadequacy. Deficient women also showed significantly lower total vBMD at the diaphyseal site than those with levels above 50 nmol/l (p = 0·047). There were no significant differences between women with inadequate levels and those with levels above 50 nmol/l, for any of the bone measurements. After controlling for weight and age, these differences persisted for total vBMD (ANCOVA p = 0·039), but not for cortical vBMD (p = 0·145). There were no significant differences in other pQCT measurements between the three vitamin D status groups.

This study has shown that women with serum 25(OH)D concentrations below 25 nmol/l have poorer total vBMD than those with higher levels, being in accordance with the most accepted minimum threshold for vitamin D levels of 25 nmol/l to prevent detrimental effects to bone health, with findings independent of body size. The specific nutrient:gene/endocrine interactions and how these concomitantly affect vitamin D metabolism and bone health indices will be explored further within each country cohort. The D-SOL Study will provide valuable insights into the specific predictors and requirements to prevent vitamin D deficiency for Brazilian women living abroad and in their native country.

MMM gratefully acknowledges funding from the Science Without Borders Scheme (CNPq).

References

1.Lips, P & van Schoor, NM (2011) Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab, 25, 585–91.Google Scholar
2.Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (2016) Vitamin D and Health. Public Health England.Google Scholar
3.Institute of Medicine (2011) Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington (DC): National Academic Press.Google Scholar