Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:17:29.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dietary fibre intake and constipation in the UK Women's Cohort Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2013

L. Alrefaai
Affiliation:
School of Food Science & Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
J. E. Cade
Affiliation:
School of Food Science & Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
V. J. Burley
Affiliation:
School of Food Science & Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 

Although it has long been recognised that dietary fibre has an impact on faecal volume, reports of relationships between dietary fibre and incidence of constipation are sparse and inconsistent( Reference Dukas, Willett and Giovannucci 1 , Reference Markland, Palsson and Goode2 ). The UK Women Cohort's Study( Reference Cade, Burley and Greenwood 3 ) is a population-based prospective cohort study of middle-aged women that we have used here to explore the relationship between dietary fibre intake and risk of constipation.

From 35,372 women who completed a 217-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) between 1996 and 1999, approximately 45% also completed a follow-up questionnaire after an average of 4 years. At follow-up, the women reported frequency of bowel movements and consistency of stools which were used to define constipation. Two sets of criteria were applied; having ⩽3 bowel movements (BM) per week (1st definition) and having hard stools and ⩽3 BM per week (2nd definition). Estimates of dietary fibre intake (non-starch polysaccharides) and main sources of fibre were obtained from the baseline FFQ.

After exclusion criteria were applied (pregnancy, unfeasible energy or fibre intakes, prevalent bowel disease), 10,517 eligible subjects remained for the analysis. Logistic regression was used to explore the relationship between dietary fibre intake at baseline and having a subsequent definition of constipation (using either definition) at follow-up. Two models were used, an unadjusted and a multivariable-adjusted model.

Using the first definition of constipation (⩽3 BM/wk), 589 (5.9%) of the women were constipated whereas just 192 (1.8%) women met the criteria for the second definition (⩽3 BM/wk & hard stool). The odds of being constipated at follow-up were significantly lower (by 40–50%) in women in the highest fibre intake quintile compared with the lowest consumers using the first and second constipation definitions respectively (see table). All sources of fibre were inversely associated with lower odds of constipation using the first definition, however, only vegetable fibre was inversely associated with constipation using the second definition.

* Values are odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) 1adjusted for smoking, alcohol, age, body mass index and exercise habits.

In this cohort of health conscious women, with each 5 g per day increment of dietary fibre consumed, the odds of being constipated were reduced by 12 to 16%. In order to maintain good bowel health, these data lend support to public health recommendations that encourage consumption of high fibre food sources.

References

1. Dukas, L, Willett, WC, Giovannucci, EL (2003) Am J Gastroenterol 98, 1790–6.Google Scholar
2. Markland, AD, Palsson, O, Goode, PS et al. (2013) Am J Gastroenterol (2013) April 9.Google Scholar
3. Cade, JE, Burley, VJ, Greenwood, DC et al. (2004) Public Health Nutr (2004) 7, 871–8.Google Scholar
Figure 0

*