Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:54:38.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Supernovae and their Evolution in a Low Metallicity ISM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2008

Roger A. Chevalier
Roger A. Chevalier*
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400325, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Observations of core collapse supernovae and their progenitors generally support expectations of increasing mass loss with increasing initial mass. Mass loss rates are expected to decline at lower metallicity, and there are prospects for directly testing this for the red supergiant progenitors of Type IIP supernovae. However, there are indications that mass loss rates for high mass early type stars may be overestimated and that there are mass loss mechanisms that do not decline at lower metallicity. In this case, there may be supernova emission from strong circumstellar interaction even at low metallicity. Although there is evidence for dust formation in freely expanding ejecta of supernovae, the quantities are relatively small. Another promising site of dust formation is the circumstellar interaction region, but this should occur in only a fraction of supernovae.

Keywords

Galaxies: abundancesstars: mass losssupernovae: generalsupernova remnants
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 4 , Issue S255: Low-Metallicity Star Formation: From the First Stars to Dwarf Galaxies , June 2008 , pp. 175 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Baraffe, I., Heger, A., & Woosley, S. E. 2001, ApJ, 550, 890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappellaro, E., Turatto, M., Tsvetkov, D. Y., Bartunov, O. S., Pollas, C., Evans, R., & Hamuy, M. 1997, A&A, 322, 431Google Scholar
Chevalier, R. A., Fransson, C., & Nymark, T. K. 2006, ApJ, 641, 1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chieffi, A., Domínguez, I., Höflich, P., Limongi, M., & Straniero, O. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chugai, N. N., & Chevalier, R. A. 2006, ApJ, 641, 1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmhamdi, A., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 338, 939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ercolano, B., Barlow, M. J., & Sugerman, B. E. K. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, O., et al. 2008, ApJ, in preparationGoogle Scholar
Fruchter, A. S., et al. 2006, Nature, 441, 463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harutyunyan, A., et al. 2007, CBET, 948, 1Google Scholar
Heger, A., Fryer, C. L., Woosley, S. E., Langer, N., & Hartmann, D. H. 2003, ApJ, 591, 288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izotov, Y. I., Thuan, T. X., & Guseva, N. G. 2007, ApJ, 671, 1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W., Wang, X., Van Dyk, S. D., Cuillandre, J.-C., Foley, R. J., & Filippenko, A. V. 2007, ApJ, 661, 1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maund, J. R., Smartt, S. J., Kudritzki, R. P., Podsiadlowski, P., & Gilmore, G. F. 2004, Nature, 427, 129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meikle, W. P. S., et al. 2007, ApJ, 665, 608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modjaz, M., et al. 2008, AJ, 135, 1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozawa, T., et al. 2008, ApJ, in press (arXiv:0801.2015)Google Scholar
Ofek, E. O., et al. 2007, ApJ, 659, L13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsiadlowski, P., Morris, T. S., & Ivanova, N. 2007, in: Immler, S., Weiler, K., & McCray, R. (eds.), Supernova 1987A: 20 Years After (Melville, NY: AIP), p. 125Google Scholar
Pozzo, M., Meikle, W. P. S., Fassia, A., Geballe, T., Lundqvist, P., Chugai, N. N., & Sollerman, J. 2004, MNRAS, 352, 457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prieto, J. L., Stanek, K. Z., & Beacom, J. F. 2008, ApJ, 673, 999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scannapieco, E., Madau, P., Woosley, S., Heger, A., & Ferrara, A. 2005, ApJ, 633, 1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, E. M. 1990, MNRAS, 244, 269Google Scholar
Smith, N., & Owocki, S. P. 2006, ApJ, 645, L45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N., et al. 2007, ApJ, 666, 1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N., Foley, R. J., & Filippenko, A. V. 2008a, ApJ, 680, 568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N., et al. 2008b, ApJ, in press (arXiv:0802.1743)Google Scholar
Sugerman, B. E. K., et al. 2006, Science, 313, 196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temim, T., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 1610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todini, P. & Ferrara, A. 2001, MNRAS, 325, 726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woosley, S. E. 1993, ApJ, 405, 273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woosley, S. E. & Heger, A. 2006, ApJ, 637, 914Google Scholar
Yoon, S.-C. & Langer, N. 2005, A&A, 443, 643Google Scholar