Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T04:31:25.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The stellar magnetic dynamo during the evolution across the main sequence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2010

Swetlana Hubrig
Swetlana Hubrig*
Affiliation:
Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam, An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In comparison with stellar magnetic field studies in the eighties and nineties, where most effort was focused on A, B, and active solar-type stars, magnetic fields are currently directly measured in massive early B and O stars with radiative envelopes, as well as in the lower mass tail consisting of fully convective late-M dwarfs. Knowledge of the magnetic field topology of stars of different mass and at different evolutionary stages is important to understand the underlying magnetic field generation mechanisms. I review the present status of magnetic field studies along with the results of theoretical modeling.

Keywords

MHDinstabilitiestechniques: polarimetricbinaries: spectroscopicstars: chemically peculiarstars: evolutionstars: formationstars: magnetic fieldsstars: pre–main-sequencestars: spots
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Symposium S264: Solar and Stellar Variability: Impact on Earth and Planets , August 2009 , pp. 171 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Arlt, R., Hollerbach, R., & Rüdiger, G. 2003, A&A, 401, 1087Google Scholar
Barnes, S. A. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, M. K. 2008, ApJ, 676, 1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantiello, M., Langer, N., Brott, I., et al. 2009, A&A, 499, 279Google Scholar
Chabrier, G. & Küker, M. 2006, A&A, 446, 1027Google Scholar
Donati, J.-F., Babel, J., Harries, T. J., et al. 2002, MNRAS, 333, 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donati, J.-F., Howarth, I. D., Bouret, J., et al. 2006a, MNRAS, 365, 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donati, J.-F., Howarth, I. D., Jardine, M. M., et al. 2006b, MNRAS, 370, 629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorch, S. B. F. 2004, A&A, 423, 1101Google Scholar
Featherstone, N. A., Browning, M. K., Brun, A. S., et al. 2007, AN, 328, 1126Google Scholar
Gilliland, R. L. & Dupree, A. K. 1996, ApJ (Letters), 463, L29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempelmann, A., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., Schultz, M., et al. 1995, A&A, 294, 515Google Scholar
Hubrig, S., Plachinda, S. I., Hünsch, M., et al. 1994, A&A, 291, 690Google Scholar
Hubrig, S. & Mathys, G. 1995, ComAp, 18, 167Google Scholar
Hubrig, S. 1998, CoSka, 27, 249Google Scholar
Hubrig, S., Schöller, M., & Yudin, R. V. 2004, A&A (Letters), 428, L1Google Scholar
Hubrig, S., Briquet, M., Schöller, M., et al. 2006a, MNRAS, 369, 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubrig, S., González, J. F., Savanov, I., et al. 2006b, MNRAS, 371, 1953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubrig, S., Schöller, M, Yudin, R. V., et al. 2006c, A&A, 446, 1089Google Scholar
Hubrig, S., Pogodin, M., Yudin, R. V., et al. 2007, A&A, 463, 1069Google Scholar
Hubrig, S., Schöller, M., Schnerr, R. S., et al. 2008a, A&A, 490, 793Google Scholar
Hubrig, S., Briquet, M., Morel, T., et al. 2008b, A&A, 488, 287Google Scholar
Hubrig, S., Briquet, M., Morel, T., et al. 2009a, AN, 330, 317Google Scholar
Hubrig, S., Schöller, M., Savanov, I., et al. 2009b, AN, 330, 708Google Scholar
Hubrig, S., Stelzer, B., Schöller, M., et al. 2009c, A&A, 502, 283Google Scholar
Hünsch, M., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., & Voges, W. 1998, A&AS, 127, 251Google Scholar
Kitchatinov, L. L. 2001, ARep, 45, 816Google Scholar
Konstantinova-Antova, R., Auriére, M., Iliev, I. Kh., et al. 2008, A&A, 480, 475Google Scholar
Küker, M. & Rüdiger, G. 1999, A&A, 346, 922Google Scholar
Küker, M. 2009, AIPC, 1094, 77Google Scholar
MacGregor, K. B. & Cassinelli, J. P. 2003, ApJ, 586, 480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamajek, E. E. & Hillebrand, L. A. 2008, ApJ, 687, 1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, C. F. & Ostriker, E. C. 2007, ARAA, 45, 565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montesinos, B., Thomas, J. H., Ventura, P., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 326, 877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, J., Donati, J.-F., Petit, P., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 390, 567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noyes, R. W., Weiss, N. O., & Vaughan, A. H. 1984, ApJ, 287, 769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pevtsov, A. A., Fisher, G. H., Acton, L. W., et al. 2003, ApJ, 598, 1387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiners, A. & Basri, G. 2009, A&A, 496, 787Google Scholar
Robrade, J. & Schmitt, J. H. M. M. 2009, A&A, 497, 511Google Scholar
Rüdiger, G. & Kitchatinov, L. L. 2009, astro-ph/09081841Google Scholar
Savanov, I. S., Hubrig, S., González, J. F., et al. 2009, IAUS, 259, 401Google Scholar
Sivagnanam, P. 2004, MNRAS, 347, 1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skumanich, A. 1972, ApJ, 171, 565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stothers, R. B. & Chin, C. 1993, ApJ (Letters), 408, L85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soderblom, D. R., Duncan, D. K., & Johnson, D. R. H. 1991, ApJ, 375, 722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokoloff, D. D., Nefedov, S. N., Ermash, A. A., et al. 2008, AstL, 34, 761Google Scholar
Tout, C. A. & Pringle, J. E. 1995, MNRAS, 272, 528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vink, J. S., Drew, J. E., Harries, T. J., et al. 2002, MNRAS, 337, 356CrossRefGoogle Scholar