Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:42:13.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resistivity and dissipation in pulsar magnetospheres

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2013

Jason Li
Affiliation:
Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Peyton Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA email: [email protected]
Anatoly Spitkovsky
Affiliation:
Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Peyton Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA email: [email protected]
Alexander Tchekhovskoy
Affiliation:
Princeton Center for Theoretical Science, Princeton University, Jadwin Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Current models of pulsar magnetospheres typically assume either a complete absence of plasma or abundant ideal plasma filling the magnetosphere in order to compute the field structure. The latter condition is thought to be closer to reality, but we know of a number of pulsars in which the ideal conditions break down, resulting in dissipation and high-energy emission. In this work we formulate a resistive force-free scheme that allows us to consider the effects of resistive plasma and accelerating fields on the magnetospheric structure. We run numerical simulations to construct a family of resistive solutions that smoothly bridges the gap between the vacuum and the force-free magnetosphere solutions. We further provide a self-consistent model for the spin-down of intermittent pulsars, pulsars which appear to transition between radio-loud and radio-quiet states with different spin-down rates. Finally, we present models for high-energy emission from reconnecting current sheets in Gamma-ray pulsars.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Arka, I. & Dubus, G. 2012, arXiv:1208.2819Google Scholar
Bai, X. & Spitkovsky, A. 2010, ApJ, 715, 1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogovalov, S. V. 1999, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 349, 1017Google Scholar
Camilo, F., Ransom, S. M., Chatterjee, S., Johnston, S., & Demorest, P. 2012, ApJ, 746, 63Google Scholar
Contopoulos, I., Kazanas, D., & Fendt, C. 1999, ApJ, 511, 351Google Scholar
Deutsch, A. J. 1955, Annales d'Astrophysique, 18, 1Google Scholar
Kalapotharakos, C., Kazanas, D., Harding, A., & Contopoulos, I. 2012, ApJ, 749, 2Google Scholar
Kirk, J. G., Skjæraasen, O., & Gallant, Y. A. 2002, A&A, 388, L29Google Scholar
Kramer, M., Lyne, A. G., O'Brien, J. T., Jordan, C. A., & Lorimer, D. R. 2006, Science, 312, 549Google Scholar
Li, J., Spitkovsky, A., & Tchekhovskoy, A. 2012a, ApJ, 746, 60Google Scholar
Li, J., Spitkovsky, A., & Tchekhovskoy, A. 2012b, ApJL, 746, L24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., Spitkovsky, A., & Tchekhovskoy, A. 2012c, in prepGoogle Scholar
Lyne, A. G. 2009, ASSL, 357, 67Google Scholar
Lyne, A., Hobbs, G., Kramer, M., Stairs, I., & Stappers, B. 2010, Science, 329, 408Google Scholar
Lyubarskii, Y. E. 1996, A&A, 311, 172Google Scholar
Pétri, J. 2011, MNRAS, 412, 1870Google Scholar
Pétri, J. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 2023Google Scholar
Pétri, J. & Kirk, J. G. 2005, ApJL, 627, L37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitkovsky, A. 2006, ApJL, 648, L51Google Scholar
Uzdensky, D. A. & Spitkovsky, A. 2012, arXiv:1210.3346Google Scholar