Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:04:07.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Planetary systems in star clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2016

Maxwell Xu Cai
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, 20A Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, P.R. China email: [email protected] Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University 5 Yi He Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing
Rainer Spurzem
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, 20A Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, P.R. China email: [email protected] Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University 5 Yi He Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Zentrum für Astronomie, University of Heidelberg, Mönchhofstrasse 12-14, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
M. B. N. Kouwenhoven
Affiliation:
Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University 5 Yi He Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the solar neighborhood, where the typical relaxation timescale is larger than the cosmic age, at least 10% to 15% of Sun-like stars have planetary systems with Jupiter-mass planets. In contrast, dense star clusters, characterized by frequent close encounters, have been found to host very few planets. We carry out numerical simulations with different initial conditions to investigate the dynamical stability of planetary systems in star cluster environments.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2016 

References

Chambers, J. E. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 793Google Scholar
Elson, R., Hut, P., & Inagaki, S. 1987, ARAA, 25, 565Google Scholar
Fujii, M., Iwasawa, M., Funato, Y., & Makino, J. 2007, PASJ, 59, 1095Google Scholar
Hao, W., Kouwenhoven, M. B. N., & Spurzem, R. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lada, C. J. & Lada, E. A. 2003, ARAA, 41, 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelupessy, F. I., van Elteren, A., de Vries, N., et al. 2013, A&A, 557, AA84Google Scholar
Portegies Zwart, S.et al. 2013, Computer Physics Communications, 183, 456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portegies Zwart, S., McMillan, S., Harfst, S., et al. 2009, New Astronomy, 14, 369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, L. 1987, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press 1987 191 p.Google Scholar
Spurzem, R. 1999, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 109, 407Google Scholar
Spurzem, R., Giersz, M., Heggie, D. C., & Lin, D. N. C. 2009, ApJ, 697, 458Google Scholar